skipunk schrieb:
>
> I am aware that more nic's do not increase throughput. Basically a
> backup server has to be in place tonight and I really don't want to
> start from scratch and now reaching for anything that will resolve
> the issue within the next few hours.
1. test the lto drive with tar/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My copy uses Apache .htaccess for login information. Check to see if you
missed something in the installation documentation.
RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> No one out there is using bweb?? with users?? does it work?? is it broken??
> am i wasting my time
No one out there is using bweb?? with users?? does it work?? is it broken?? am
i wasting my time??
Computer King CaN-MailSurveillance King
http://computerking.ca http://canmail.org http://surveillanceking.net
Surveillance - Sales Service - Hosting
>
> After returning to my office this morning, I had found the server was
> connected to a 10/100 switch. I had moved it to the rack and
connected it to
> the switch 10/100/1000 and nic 1 pulls 1000 on ethtools
> nic 2 pulls 100 on ethtools.
>
> After futher investigation, it looks like nic 2 is
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 05:22:52PM -0400, skipunk wrote:
> We are running a Gigabit network. All servers have gigabit connection.
Are you using managed switches, such as Cisco Catalyst switches?
Those can be configured per port to use lower speeds. If one end is
hardcoded to 100/full and the o
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 02:04:15PM -0400, skipunk wrote:
> Even running on 1 nic, my speeds have jumped up to a max of 8 Mb/s with an
> avg of 3 - 4 Mb/s when doing backups over the net.
>
> A little better but not where it should be.
>
> I'm at a loss for the moment.
Test your network connect
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 6:26 PM, skipunk wrote:
>
> I am aware that more nic's do not increase throughput. Basically a backup
> server has to be in place tonight and I really don't want to start from
> scratch and now reaching for anything that will resolve the issue within the
> next few hours
I am aware that more nic's do not increase throughput. Basically a backup
server has to be in place tonight and I really don't want to start from scratch
and now reaching for anything that will resolve the issue within the next few
hours.
+--
On 24.05.2010 22:31, skipunk wrote:
> What would it take to clear up the network bottleneck. I was looking
> at another server that came with our gaming system. Same server
> (memory, hd, etc) and tape library, running on win2k3 and netbackup
> with no issues. The only difference is, it's running
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 10:34:26 +0200
> From: Marcus M?lb?sch
> Subject:
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <4bf4f412.40...@as-infodienste.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>> >I have to admit I am a bit confused now with t
We are running a Gigabit network. All servers have gigabit connection.
I looked more in detail on the other server identical to ours and the other
difference I found is that TL2000 is connected via scsi instead of SAS.
Right now I pulled the drives and put some spares in to install win2k3 an
> What would it take to clear up the network bottleneck.
Upgrade to gigabit networking. A 24 port gigabit switch can be had for
under $200 US. However that assumes your desktops can support gigabit.
Most motherboards come with gigabit for the last 3 years however dell,
hp ... have been selling des
skipunk wrote:
>
> What would it take to clear up the network bottleneck. I was looking at
> another server that came with our gaming system. Same server (memory, hd,
> etc) and tape library, running on win2k3 and netbackup with no issues. The
> only difference is, it's running 4 nic's. So it's
Guys,
When trying to "make" the bacula-rescue on a Debian 5.0 box, I got this
several deps:
...
Could not find ash on your system
Could not find chkconfig on your system
Could not find consoletype on your system
Could not find dhcpd on your system
Coul
What would it take to clear up the network bottleneck. I was looking at
another server that came with our gaming system. Same server (memory, hd, etc)
and tape library, running on win2k3 and netbackup with no issues. The only
difference is, it's running 4 nic's. So it's leaving me a bit baffle
duxbuz pisze:
> Thanks.
>
> I ran the first of the debug commands
>
> u...@mypc:~/bacula/bin$ sudo ./bacula-dir -d 200 -c bacula-dir.conf
>
>
> and had this output:
>
> bacula-dir: dird.c:184-0 Debug level = 200
> bacula-dir: runscript.c:296-0 runscript: debug
> bacula-dir: runscript.c:297-0
I can run multiple concurrent backups to the 1 drive. I was doing that with our
AIT setup. right now the new server is set to do 3 backups, but I think I could
kick it up to 5. I added a 2nd nic in so I'm now running two 1 gig nics to the
core switch (which is where all the servers that are be
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Richard Scobie wrote:
> skipunk wrote:
>>
>> After returning to my office this morning, I had found the server was
>> connected to a 10/100 switch. I had moved it to the rack and connected it
>> to the switch 10/100/1000 and nic 1 pulls 1000 on ethtools
>> nic 2
--- On Mon, 5/24/10, Brian Debelius wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/24/hitach_maxell_perp_tape/
>
> Hitachi Maxell has demonstrated a 50TB capacity LTO-class
> tape using
> perpendicular magnetic recording technology. This is
> 400 per cent more
> than the raw capacity of the h
skipunk wrote:
>
> After returning to my office this morning, I had found the server was
> connected to a 10/100 switch. I had moved it to the rack and connected it to
> the switch 10/100/1000 and nic 1 pulls 1000 on ethtools
> nic 2 pulls 100 on ethtools.
>
> After futher investigation, it look
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/24/hitach_maxell_perp_tape/
Hitachi Maxell has demonstrated a 50TB capacity LTO-class tape using
perpendicular magnetic recording technology. This is 400 per cent more
than the raw capacity of the highest-capacity tape on the LTO roadmap,
the 12.8TB LTO-8.
Hi,
The storage daemon crashed last night and restarting it seemed to put
things back to normal (I'm still looking into the cause of the crash).
The first backup job that ran after the crash marked the tape in Error:
24-May 10:10 server.domain.com-sd JobId 195: Volume "CSE003L4"
previousl
After returning to my office this morning, I had found the server was connected
to a 10/100 switch. I had moved it to the rack and connected it to the switch
10/100/1000 and nic 1 pulls 1000 on ethtools
nic 2 pulls 100 on ethtools.
After futher investigation, it looks like nic 2 is capped at 1
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2010, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to track down the cause of tapes being stuck in our library at
> > random times.
>
> What is the make and model of your library, _and_ your tape drives?
>
> I get this semi-regularly
On 5/24/2010 10:14 AM, Estela C. Macías T. wrote:
> Hi guys:
>
> I want a help, Recently On the university where I Work, We addquire a
> Storage NetAPP, Library Tape TLS-8466 and Rack with Blades Sun-Oracle.
>
> Also we currently have servers native on Rack HP, Virtual Machines on
> Rack Blades Su
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> I'm trying to track down the cause of tapes being stuck in our library at
> random times.
What is the make and model of your library, _and_ your tape drives?
I get this semi-regularly here with HP LTO2 drives and MSL6000 changer
(Overland Neo 4000)
M
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:49 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> > Someone mentioned that changing "Always open" to "no" could help, but
> that
> > kind of scares me. I'd like the protection of preventing removal, as long
> a
> > Bacula can re-enable it when it needs to change tapes.
> > I've had multiple
On 5/23/2010 1:58 PM, Marc Chamberlin wrote:
I am having a lot of difficulty getting a full backup of Vista
systems, most of the time it fails with some kind of network error,
usually after several gigabytes/hours have elapsed. I do not get this
when doing a full backup of Linux systems (even
Scott et al,
After building the 5.0.2 packages ()postgres flavour) and trying to
install the client package, I got the following errors:
Dependencies Resolved
Package
Hello everyone:
my problem is that I descarhe bacula-web and test it in correctly but it
gives me FOLLOWING: error Error query: 4
any ideas?
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacu
> Someone mentioned that changing "Always open" to "no" could help, but that
> kind of scares me. I'd like the protection of preventing removal, as long a
> Bacula can re-enable it when it needs to change tapes.
> I've had multiple drives changed out, and have updated the firmware on the
> drives a
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:00 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> > I'm trying to track down the cause of tapes being stuck in our library at
> > random times. When a tape is stuck, the library reports that a soft
> removal
> > error occurred, and all I can think of is that Bacula is sending the
> Prevent
> I'm trying to track down the cause of tapes being stuck in our library at
> random times. When a tape is stuck, the library reports that a soft removal
> error occurred, and all I can think of is that Bacula is sending the Prevent
> Media Removal command to prevent tapes from being changed out wi
I'm trying to track down the cause of tapes being stuck in our library at
random times. When a tape is stuck, the library reports that a soft removal
error occurred, and all I can think of is that Bacula is sending the Prevent
Media Removal command to prevent tapes from being changed out without it
Hi guys:
I want a help, Recently On the university where I Work, We addquire a
Storage NetAPP, Library Tape TLS-8466 and Rack with Blades Sun-Oracle.
Also we currently have servers native on Rack HP, Virtual Machines on
Rack Blades Sun-Oracle, Xen Citrix 5.0 comunnity version running on
SAN
I am using Bacula 5.0.2 and see around with issue that during restore no files
were found for building directory tree for FULL volume.
My File database expired (due to short retention), and restore offered me to
restore all files:
For one or more of the JobIds selected, no files were found, so f
I have figured out what was happening. It was a combination of two
things, firstly the upgrade to 5.0.2 had made the file
/usr/lib/libbac-5.0.1.so only readable by root. I fixed this problem by
doing:
chown root:bacula on /usr/lib/libbac-5.0.1.so
Secondly, Outlook had decided the messages from ba
Hello,
I tried baculat 5.0.1 and I'm getting this error when I try a full backup:
srvbasu01-dir Max Volume jobs exceeded. Marking Volume "Full-0036" as Used.
srvadet01-fd ERROR in smartall.c:124 Failed ASSERT: nbytes > 0
srvbasu01-dir Fatal error: Network error with FD during Backup: ERR=No
data
Thanks.
I ran the first of the debug commands
u...@mypc:~/bacula/bin$ sudo ./bacula-dir -d 200 -c bacula-dir.conf
and had this output:
bacula-dir: dird.c:184-0 Debug level = 200
bacula-dir: runscript.c:296-0 runscript: debug
bacula-dir: runscript.c:297-0 --> RunScript
bacula-dir: runscript
39 matches
Mail list logo
