Hi,
using bat on a bacula-client (win7-32bit), i was able to see and restore
data of another client (using version-browser).
This should not happen.
In my opinion clients should see and restore only their own data.
Do i have misconfigured/misunderstood something on the server ?
bacula 5.0.3, serv
This is what i have try new things to get it working
[QUOTE=catkin;4155735]Thank you for the full explanation.
It seems strange that a firewall would block 9103 and 9105 but allow 9104.
Have you checked that all the Bacula daemons are running. For example by /bacula status
I'm a little worried
This is what i have try new things to get it working
[QUOTE=catkin;4155735]Thank you for the full explanation.
It seems strange that a firewall would block 9103 and 9105 but allow 9104.
Have you checked that all the Bacula daemons are running. For example by /bacula status
I'm a little worried
sorry i posted it 2 times here and i can't delete any of theme becuse it has
alredy replied by me :/
+--
|This was sent by embraer1...@hotmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+---
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
>
>> We seem to have the correct indexes on the file table. I've run optimize
>> table
>> and it still takes 14 minutes to build the tree on one of our bigger clients.
>> We have 51 million entr
"Markus Goldberg" kirjoitti viestissä
news:30197411.p...@talk.nabble.com...
>
> Hi,
> using bat on a bacula-client (win7-32bit), i was able to see and restore
> data of another client (using version-browser).
> This should not happen.
> In my opinion clients should see and restore only their own
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Mikael Fridh wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Gavin McCullagh
> wrote:
> > # Time: 10 14:24:49
> > # u...@host: bacula[bacula] @ localhost []
> > # Query_time: 1139.657646 Lock_time: 0.000471 Rows_sent: 4263403
> > Rows_examined: 50351037
> > SET timest
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>
> "Markus Goldberg" kirjoitti viestissä
> news:30197411.p...@talk.nabble.com...
>>
>> Hi,
>> using bat on a bacula-client (win7-32bit), i was able to see and restore
>> data of another client (using version-browser).
>> This should not happen.
>> In my opinion clients sh
On 11/10/2010 04:56 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 11/10/10 09:32, Igor Zinovik wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm deploying bacula in our network. Before it will go into production I
>> need
>> to solve one problem for myself how should I manage pools in my setup.
>>
>> I have an ordinary linux box r
Mikael Fridh wrote:
> Tuning's not going to get any of those 50 million traversed rows
> disappear. Only a differently optimized query plan will.
This applies across both mysql and postgresql...
>> This is an Ubuntu Linux server running MySQL v5.1.41. The mysql data is on
>> an
>> MD software
'Alan Brown' wrote:
>Mikael Fridh wrote:
>
>> Tuning's not going to get any of those 50 million traversed rows
>> disappear. Only a differently optimized query plan will.
>
>This applies across both mysql and postgresql...
>
>>> This is an Ubuntu Linux server running MySQL v5.1.41. The mysql data
Hello All,
Has anyone encountered the following error:
12-Nov 14:16 C011-fd JobId 471: Fatal error: Generate VSS snapshots failed.
ERR=Es sind mehr Daten verfügbar.
where the error message is in German and means "There are more files".
The client is WinXP.
I appreciate your hints.
Best regar
> From: Gavin McCullagh
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Tuning for large (millions of files)
> backups?
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <2010144733.gz20...@gcd.ie>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
>
>> > W
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:04:35 -0800, Philip Brown said:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been wrestling with configuration of a filesystem based
> autochanger, aka the 'disk-changer' script.
>
> I've made some progress, but have hit a point where I believe a bug in
> the core sd libraries (specifically
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:18:14 +0100, Oliver Hoffmann said:
>
> I had the following problem with 3.0.2 as well as now with 5.0.2 (runs
> on ubuntu 10.10). When I change the pool and accordingly the storage
> device of a client, then the job won't run because the scheduled volume
> is marked *u
Martin Simmons writes:
>Have you looked at how the regression tests do it? In particular:
>http://bacula.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=bacula/bacula;a=blob;f=regress/scripts/bacula-sd-2disk.conf.in;h=7f8f33e9fb1b896aa65db3739dda1d2d367b4154;hb=HEAD
>I don't know if that works, but it is s
Hello,
I got no response to my last mail below, so I'll try and summarise my
questions a little:
(Bacula 3.0.2 on Ubuntu 9.04)
1. If I copy a backup job, is the retention period of the original
backup job or the copy backup job used by bacula. I ask because my
originals (disk) have a 2 day retent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You clearly missed Timo's response where he answered question #1. Take a
look at the list.
On 11/12/2010 05:24 PM, Dermot Beirne wrote:
> Hello,
> I got no response to my last mail below, so I'll try and summarise my
> questions a little:
> (Bacula 3.
hi,
had anyone succeed installing the new bacula web feature with Centos?
i found some posts in the net on how to do it but it's under ubuntu 9,
and still none about centos.
i would be very thankful if anyone can help us with it, it seems a very
interesting feature.
thanks in advance.
Salim.
--
Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:50:46 -0500, AndyW said:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > I have been using Bacula for a few months now happily on x86_64 FC12 & FC13.
> > I have just now upgraded to FC14, duing which my B
> Hello All,
>
> Has anyone encountered the following error:
>
> 12-Nov 14:16 C011-fd JobId 471: Fatal error: Generate VSS snapshots failed.
> ERR=Es sind mehr Daten verfügbar.
>
> where the error message is in German and means "There are more files".
>
> The client is WinXP.
>
> I appreciate
On 12/11/2010 10:46 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
[SNAP]
> Disbling innodb won't help right now, but switching to innodb would be a
> good idea in the near future as myISAM runs into problems around the 50
> million entry mark (assuming Oracle don't remove innodb from future
> versions of Mysql, as looks i
22 matches
Mail list logo
