Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-09 Thread Marcin Krol
> Out of interest, which filesystem are you using on this volume? xfs, as always when dealing with lots of small files. M. -- Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires se

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple device SD configuration

2011-01-09 Thread Silver Salonen
On Monday 10 January 2011 03:14:22 Phil Stracchino wrote: > Hey folks, > I'm trying a few things I haven't tried before, including accurate > backups and VirtualFull backups, as a result of which, as far as I can > tell, I need to create a second File device on my primary SD so that I > can have th

[Bacula-users] Can't connect to Remote. - Update

2011-01-09 Thread Wayne Spivak
After tweaking (and upgrading to 5.0.3) the Bacula-Dir.Conf file a bit (and finding that I'm an idiot) I solved my problems with all the clients within (on the inside) my firewall. In fact, I added another client (windows) without problems. But the two clients that are outside (Fedora 13 and Fedo

[Bacula-users] Multiple device SD configuration

2011-01-09 Thread Phil Stracchino
Hey folks, I'm trying a few things I haven't tried before, including accurate backups and VirtualFull backups, as a result of which, as far as I can tell, I need to create a second File device on my primary SD so that I can have the input File volumes and the output VirtualFull volume both mounted

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-09 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/9/2011 6:19 PM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote: > >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. >>> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of >>> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. >>> >>> For testing purpose

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-09 Thread Oliver Hoffmann
>> Hi all, >> >> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. >> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of >> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. >> >> For testing purpose I connected one client via crosslink (1Gbit on >> bo

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-09 Thread Oliver Hoffmann
I did some tests with different gzip levels and with no compression at all. It makes a difference but not as expected. Without compression I still have a rate of only 11346.1 KB/s. Anything else I should try? Cheers, Oliver > On Saturday 08 January 2011 11:46:11 Mister IT Guru wrote: > >> On

Re: [Bacula-users] FileSet Question...

2011-01-09 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/9/2011 5:28 PM, Kianusch Sayah Karadji wrote: > Hi, > > I need to backup (actually to archive) lots of data. 24 filesystems - > each filesystem containing 2Mio+ files / 700GB. > > I need to save the data only once - since they do not change after they > are written. > > To have better control

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server

2011-01-09 Thread Arunav Mandal
When running in debug mode I get this r...@ubuntu-test:~# /usr/sbin/bacula-dir -d100 -c /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf -u bacula -g bacula bacula-dir: dird.c:184-0 Debug level = 100 r...@ubuntu-test:~# bacula-dir: jcr.c:138-0 read_last_jobs seek to 192 bacula-dir: jcr.c:145-0 Read num_items=0 bacu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server

2011-01-09 Thread Arunav Mandal
I have checked it and the configration is correct. Arunav. > Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 23:09:20 +0100 > From: andreas.ha...@evolver.de > To: di...@hotmail.com > CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server > > On Sun, 9 Jan 201

[Bacula-users] FileSet Question...

2011-01-09 Thread Kianusch Sayah Karadji
Hi, I need to backup (actually to archive) lots of data. 24 filesystems - each filesystem containing 2Mio+ files / 700GB. I need to save the data only once - since they do not change after they are written. To have better control over what to backup and not to have a single backup run for sever

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server

2011-01-09 Thread Andreas Haase - evolver group
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Arunav Mandal wrote: > The strange thing is that I can connect to port 9101 via telnet but not > via bconsole. then please check the configuration of your director and bconsole. Maybe they don't match together. Bye, Andreas

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server

2011-01-09 Thread Arunav Mandal
The strange thing is that I can connect to port 9101 via telnet but not via bconsole. Arunav. > Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 17:39:21 +0100 > From: andreas.ha...@evolver.de > To: di...@hotmail.com > CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server

2011-01-09 Thread Arunav Mandal
Bconsole doesnt print any messages just times out after some time. Arunav. > Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 17:39:21 +0100 > From: andreas.ha...@evolver.de > To: di...@hotmail.com > CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server > > H

Re: [Bacula-users] Creating "archival" backup

2011-01-09 Thread John Drescher
> From what I've read, that means the volumes will not be recycled.  But > will they still be considered as the base from which an inc/diff > backup can be built? That is why you need a separate job with the same fileset. John

Re: [Bacula-users] Creating "archival" backup

2011-01-09 Thread Ben Beuchler
>> Once a year, I need to create a full backup that will be stored >> off-site.  This backup will not be readily available for normal >> restores.  The obvious approach would be to delete that backup (and >> its volumes) from the catalog so they will not be considered when >> performing future back

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server

2011-01-09 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 01/09/2011 05:39 PM, Andreas Haase - evolver group wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Arunav Mandal wrote: >> I have created bacula 5.0.3 deb packages in Ubuntu 10.10 64bit machine >> and installed it. When I tried running bconsole it never connects to the >> director. I have tried the s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.3 packages for Ubuntu 10.10 server

2011-01-09 Thread Andreas Haase - evolver group
Hello, On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Arunav Mandal wrote: > I have created bacula 5.0.3 deb packages in Ubuntu 10.10 64bit machine > and installed it. When I tried running bconsole it never connects to the > director. I have tried the same configuration in Ubuntu supplied Bacula > 5.0.2 and it works fine

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread John Drescher
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:00 AM, John Drescher wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > wrote: >> - Original Message - >>> >> Do you also have "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" set in the Director >>> >> resource of bacula-dir.conf ? >>> > >>> > yes, it's set to 20. >>> >

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread John Drescher
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > - Original Message - >> >> Do you also have "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" set in the Director >> >> resource of bacula-dir.conf ? >> > >> > yes, it's set to 20. >> > >> >> And do your jobs that you want to run concurrently all go

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
- Original Message - > >> Do you also have "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" set in the Director > >> resource of bacula-dir.conf ? > > > > yes, it's set to 20. > > > > And do your jobs that you want to run concurrently all go to the same > pool and are the same priority? Yes and yes. The storage

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread John Drescher
>> Do you also have "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" set in the Director >> resource of bacula-dir.conf ? > > yes, it's set to 20. > And do your jobs that you want to run concurrently all go to the same pool and are the same priority? John ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> Do you also have "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" set in the Director > resource of bacula-dir.conf ? yes, it's set to 20. Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum present

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread John Drescher
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >> There are 5 or more places to use "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" depending >> on the level of concurrency you want. I believe the default in the >> bacula-fd.conf is already 20 so this place is not really doing much. >> You need to set it

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> There are 5 or more places to use "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" depending > on the level of concurrency you want. I believe the default in the > bacula-fd.conf is already 20 so this place is not really doing much. > You need to set it in the bacula-dir.conf in the director and client > resources. Als

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread John Drescher
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Guy wrote: > Hi All, > > In FileDaemon Configuration I've specified "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20" and > restarted bacula-fd on the client. > > FileDaemon {                          # this is me >  Name = baculactl.00-fd >  FDport = 9102                  # where we

Re: [Bacula-users] Differentials and Full Backups

2011-01-09 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 9.1.2011 12:58, Guy wrote: > > The question that arises is this... How can I be sure that the Differential > is done against the Full backup done to the OffSite drives, rather than the > Full backup Done to the OnSite ones?? Specially on the 1st Friday of the > Month. > It depend on the J

Re: [Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread Silver Salonen
On Sunday 09 January 2011 13:04:48 Guy wrote: > Hi All, > > In FileDaemon Configuration I've specified "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20" and > restarted bacula-fd on the client. > > FileDaemon { # this is me > Name = baculactl.00-fd > FDport = 9102 # wh

[Bacula-users] Waiting on Max Client Jobs

2011-01-09 Thread Guy
Hi All, In FileDaemon Configuration I've specified "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20" and restarted bacula-fd on the client. FileDaemon { # this is me Name = baculactl.00-fd FDport = 9102 # where we listen for the director WorkingDirectory = /var/bacul

[Bacula-users] Differentials and Full Backups

2011-01-09 Thread Guy
Hello All, I'm quite new to Bacula and so far loving it.. it's solving soo many problems that I was having with running backups in the past. However I do have a little question/clarification needed. First some background.. I have two Storage devices, both are disk based. One remains on site w