Hello together,
i have problem with maximum current jobs. i have tried to change to
various numbers.
bacula is only running 2 jobs in parallel. also job priority is in every
job the same.
here is my setup.
i have a nec LTO4 T40A2 auto changer connected via FC and one NEC LTO2
with one drive 8
Hi all, I have a job using the pool 'my-pool' and the storage
'control-station-sd'.
I wanted to save date to a differente server, on a new witha
differente volume retention value.
I see that no new file (volumes) are created in the new storage server.
My job is in running state.
The main
Il 09/02/2011 02:01, John Drescher ha scritto:
I have one iSCSI drive with more than one storage devices defined but when I
run backup jobs only runs one an the others are waiting. I want it to run
concurrently. I think that is possible running more than one storage daemon.
I tried to
John,
sorry for the probably obvious question: if I have one storage
daemon with two storage devices defined, one File and on Tape, can I
have two backup jobs running simultaneously, provided one goes on the
File device and the other one on the Tape one ?
You can have at least that
Hi,
I have in my backup problem:
lack of space I put my monthly volumes on another computer. Now I want
to do a restore, I copied the relevant month volumes back into the
system and a Bacula restore command. He seems, however, the monthly
volumes hard to find. have user, group and file
Hi!,
We've got a Disk Storage and a Tape storage working fine using two
catalogues, one for each SD.
Bye!! :-)
On 02/09/2011 08:42 AM, John Drescher wrote:
John,
sorry for the probably obvious question: if I have one storage
daemon with two storage devices defined, one File and on
You can run multiple jobs concurrently, just set Maximum concurrent jobs
= nn in bacula-sd.conf.
Regards
--
Ferdinando Pasqualetti
G.T.Dati srl
Tel. 0557310862 - 3356172731 - Fax 055720143
Da: Marcello Romani
Il 09/02/2011 12:42, John Drescher ha scritto:
John,
sorry for the probably obvious question: if I have one storage
daemon with two storage devices defined, one File and on Tape, can I
have two backup jobs running simultaneously, provided one goes on the
File device and the other one on
Is it possible to append to a failed Full backup?
I have a 16 slot autoloader and been having terrific trouble writing backups in
the last month, having bought 25 new HP LTO4 tapes. In desperation, I bought 8
Sony tapes to see if this would fix it (after writing to this list, contacting
Dell
Hello,
(To Ferdinando) The Maximum concurrent jobs is set to 20.
(To Matias) My storages are all file media type. I think that is not the same
case as you. But I can try to use two catalogs. How can I do it?
Thanks.
+--
|This
(To Ferdinando) The Maximum concurrent jobs is set to 20.
(To Matias) My storages are all file media type. I think that is not the
same case as you. But I can try to use two catalogs. How can I do it?
Two catalogs will not give you concurrency. If you do not want
separate catalogs I would
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:49 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
(To Ferdinando) The Maximum concurrent jobs is set to 20.
(To Matias) My storages are all file media type. I think that is not the
same case as you. But I can try to use two catalogs. How can I do it?
Two catalogs
Hi,
we had the discussion here latley on how to retrieve the client's adress
from bacula-dir.conf for RunAfter/Before scripts. I got some awk here that
works for me that I'd like to share:
BEGIN {RS=}\n; FS = \n;}
/Client[[:space:]]+{/ {
found = 0;
for (i = 1; i = NF; i++) {
Hi all, I have a storage server where I defined two Devices of type
file (two different folders).
I have this storage defition:
Storage {
Name = control-station-sd
# Do not use localhost here
Address = 172.16.20.27# N.B. Use a fully qualified name
here
On 02/09/11 08:54, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
Is it possible to append to a failed Full backup?
I have a 16 slot autoloader and been having terrific trouble writing backups
in
the last month, having bought 25 new HP LTO4 tapes. In desperation, I bought 8
Sony tapes to see if this would fix
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Valerio Pachera siri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, I have a storage server where I defined two Devices of type
file (two different folders).
I have this storage defition:
Storage {
Name = control-station-sd
# Do not use localhost here
Is it possible to 'pause' a job and then resume at a later time?
Jeremiah Jester
Informatics Specialist
Microbiology - Katze Lab
206-732-6185
-Original Message-
From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 8:10 AM
To:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester
jj...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Is it possible to 'pause' a job and then resume at a later time?
No
John
--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R)
On 02/09/11 12:27, Jeremiah D. Jester wrote:
Is it possible to 'pause' a job and then resume at a later time?
Well ..*sort of*.
If the job is waiting on a media request, you can hold off on changing
the media more or less as long as you want, within reason. (Though if
you have your
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:37:07 +0100, Jan Lentfer said:
Hi,
we had the discussion here latley on how to retrieve the client's adress
from bacula-dir.conf for RunAfter/Before scripts. I got some awk here that
works for me that I'd like to share:
BEGIN {RS=}\n; FS = \n;}
Whoa Nellie! Let me recycle my earlier, boring post to appeal to a
broader audience. Check out the latest Qnap NAS
http://qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=191
I am interested in the TS 112 since it MAY be able to run Bacula via
some NSLU package ipkg magic. Apparently Qnap has a package
2011/2/9 Valerio Pachera siri...@gmail.com:
I restarted bacula-director and run the job 'domain-controller-new'
manualy from bacula-console.
It started, i see the volume has been created on the new storage server.
The only problem (I think) is that it's too slow!
More than 1 our and is still
I see that server support has been pulled from the installer. I have 3.0.1
installed and configured on my windows 2003 server and it is working great.
Even though there isn't an installer for this configuration, is it possible
to manually replace my 3.0.1 binaries with 5.0.3 binaries for storage
Over the past week, I've been playing with a webpage that displays the
following information:
* what is ready for copy from disk to tape
* the status of the tapes in the tape library
* how much data is on tape
* the status of the tapes not in the tape library
The current status is at
On 2/9/2011 6:26 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Over the past week, I've been playing with a webpage that displays the
following information:
* what is ready for copy from disk to tape
* the status of the tapes in the tape library
* how much data is on tape
* the status of the tapes not in the
Jeff Shanholtz schrieb:
...
Finally, I assume that if I stay with 3.0.1 on the server, I can upgrade
clients to 5.0.3, correct? I'm crossing my fingers that the client status
window will be a little more informative than just a big blank window like
it is in 3.0.1. :)
don't know about the
On 2/9/2011 3:49 PM, Jeff Shanholtz wrote:
I see that server support has been pulled from the installer. I have
3.0.1 installed and configured on my windows 2003 server and it is
working great. Even though there isn't an installer for this
configuration, is it possible to manually replace my
Il 10/02/2011 08:14, Ralf Gross ha scritto:
Jeff Shanholtz schrieb:
...
Finally, I assume that if I stay with 3.0.1 on the server, I can upgrade
clients to 5.0.3, correct? I'm crossing my fingers that the client status
window will be a little more informative than just a big blank window like
28 matches
Mail list logo
