Am 19.04.2011 13:37, schrieb J. Echter:
> Hi,
>
> i try to set up VirtualFull backups.
>
> I have 3 pools, inc- diff- and full
>
> what do i have to put into my pool definitions?
>
> as far as my understanding is i can use NextPool = full in my full pool
> directive, but if i use this bacula stays
Hello,
yes acl exists in source and bacula is compiled with acl/xattr enabled.
we are using bacula 5.0.1 in ubuntu.
btw thanks for the replies.
cordially
Le vendredi 15 avril 2011 à 16:12 +0200, Bruno Friedmann a écrit :
> On 04/15/2011 03:10 PM, laurent flori wrote:
> > Le jeudi 14 avril 2011
On 20/04/11, Steffen Fritz (frit...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> my Dell Powervault 124T autochanger is loaded with LTO-4 tapes. When I
> run the job, it terminates with an error after 1. 000 G (999.2 MB).
> The job should save 50 GB (one file from another weekly job) per
> month. Error message is "ERR
Hallo bacula Mailinglist,
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
can't get bacula running.
Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
No SSL/TLS in use.
T
Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
> I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
> it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
> can't get bacula running.
>
> Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
> Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 a
Hi people:
I'm running Bacula 5.0.3 with an tape library IBM TS3100 using LTO5
tapes of 1.5 TB capacity each one. I have a simple question: If I run
a job backup of a server that holds more than 1.5 TB (example: 2 TB of
data), what happen when Bacula reaches the limit of the tape capacity?
Does Ba
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
>
>> Hi people:
>>
>> I'm running Bacula 5.0.3 with an tape library IBM TS3100 using LTO5
>> tapes of 1.5 TB capacity each one. I have a simple question: If I run
>> a job backup of a server t
On 04/20/11 10:17, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> When the job started Bacula took the tape L5BA0005 and never required
> another one. As you can see Bacula apparently wrote 2,058,019,117,056
> bytes (approx. 2 TB) but my tape is just 1.5 TB capacity. Does anybody
> know why? My job isn't using compressio
I use the Bat tool as a GUI to manage my bacula jobs. I was getting an error
13-Apr 10:00 JobId 1672: Job BackupClient1.2011-04-13_03.00.00_35 is waiting.
Cannot find any appendable volumes.
Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for:
Storage: "Tape" (/dev/nst0)
Pool
I am new to bacula and I have run into a problem running any job in
bconsole.
I am getting the following error.
15-Apr 11:14 KITSrv01-sd JobId 9: Fatal error: Device reservation failed for
JobId=9:
15-Apr 11:14 KITSrv01-dir JobId 9: Fatal error:
Storage daemon didn't accept Device "PV-122T-
> I am new to bacula and I have run into a problem running any job in
> bconsole.
>
> I am getting the following error.
>
> 15-Apr 11:14 KITSrv01-sd JobId 9: Fatal error: Device reservation failed for
> JobId=9:
> 15-Apr 11:14 KITSrv01-dir JobId 9: Fatal error:
> Storage daemon didn't accept D
Hi,
My name is Dan, and it's been 16 days since I last touched my bacula-dir.conf
file.
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization i
> My name is Dan, and it's been 16 days since I last touched my bacula-dir.conf
> file.
>
Probably the same for me.. Although for me it would have been an
include off of the bacula-dir.conf
John
--
Benefiting from Serv
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Paul Mather wrote:
>> On Apr 20, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
>>
>>> Hi people:
>>>
>>> I'm running Bacula 5.0.3 with an tape library IBM TS3100 using LTO5
>>> tapes of 1.5 TB capacity each one.
Hello
We back up client computers throw bacula-fd, but have some issue throw
shutdown process (when user press power off button or throw "start"
menu). We want prevent shutdown process while fd work, does exists any
solutions for this task?
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:04:22 -0700, dieruffgrad said:
I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on opensuse 11.3 64bit. I have been able to
backup to file, and restore from a file backup with no problem. I now have
an HP 72x6 dat external tape drive that I would like to use. I am kind of
lost on how to config
Am 20.04.2011 16:31, schrieb Jason Voorhees:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Paul Mather wrote:
>> On Apr 20, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
>>
>>> Hi people:
>>>
>>> I'm running Bacula 5.0.3 with an tape library IBM TS3100 using LTO5
>>> tapes of 1.5 TB capacity each one. I have a si
On 04/20/11 13:40, ruslan usifov wrote:
> Hello
>
> We back up client computers throw bacula-fd, but have some issue throw
> shutdown process (when user press power off button or throw "start"
> menu). We want prevent shutdown process while fd work, does exists any
> solutions for this task?
The
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:31:44PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Dan, and it's been 16 days since I last touched my bacula-dir.conf
> file.
Haha! This made me laugh like a drain. :)
--
Benefiting fr
Can't say the same... it's been 2 weeks that I've been touching it every
day... damn..
2011/4/20 Graham Keeling
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:31:44PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My name is Dan, and it's been 16 days since I last touched my
> bacula-dir.conf file.
>
> Haha! This mad
Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
> Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
>> I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
>> it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
>> can't get bacula running.
>>
>> Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blion wrote:
> Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
>> Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
>>> I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
>>> it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
>>> ca
Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blion wrote:
>> Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
>>> Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced
> This rule is not the real truth.
> I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
> Director (and Storage)
That does not violate the rule I gave.
> Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?
>
This rule has been told to us from the developers cou
On 4/20/2011 3:26 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> This rule is not the real truth.
>> I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
>> Director (and Storage)
> That does not violate the rule I gave.
>
>> Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?
>>
> Th
On 21/04/2011 8:18 AM, Jérôme Blion wrote:
> Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit :
[SNIP]
>>>
>> No but a simple rule. The server (director and storage) must be always =
>> client. Also the director must be the same version as the storage.
>> John
> Hello,
>
> This rule is not the real trut
> Be *very* aware of the vagaries of email clients, the line above from
> John appaers to contain the phrase "always = client", when his original
> post contained "always > = client".
>
> This is because somewhere in the chain something wrapped the
> line at "> =" and
> so the "> " was seen as bei
27 matches
Mail list logo
