Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Freebsd snapshots and complaints "Will not descend"

2011-10-10 Thread Christian Manal
Am 10.10.2011 21:11, schrieb Troy Kocher: > > On 10,Oct 2011, at 1:12 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:51:14 -0500, Troy Kocher said: >>> >> >>> 08-Oct 23:57 kfoobarb-sd JobId 2858: Job write elapsed time = 14:45:49, >>> Transfer rate = 2.702 M Bytes/second >> >> Are y

Re: [Bacula-users] query for file sizes in a job

2011-10-10 Thread ganiuszka
2011/10/7 Jeff Shanholtz : > Thanks guys. I'm pretty sure I'm using sqlite (having a hard time > determining that definitively, but I don't think I did anything from an > installation point of view beyond just installing bacula). I assume this > script is postgresql specific. Looks like the fastest

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems configuring 5.0.1 with bat

2011-10-10 Thread jerry lowry
On 10/10/2011 04:51 PM, jerry lowry wrote: Hi, I move the DIR/SD to a new motherboard and linux version. Before it was running FC 14 and now it is running Centos 5.7. The motherboard was an upgrade that was much needed. I am using the configure script that was used previously to build Bac

[Bacula-users] Problems configuring 5.0.1 with bat

2011-10-10 Thread jerry lowry
Hi, I move the DIR/SD to a new motherboard and linux version. Before it was running FC 14 and now it is running Centos 5.7. The motherboard was an upgrade that was much needed. I am using the configure script that was used previously to build Bacula ( it was also used to build a test system

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Freebsd snapshots and complaints "Will not descend"

2011-10-10 Thread Troy Kocher
On 10,Oct 2011, at 1:12 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:51:14 -0500, Troy Kocher said: >> > >> 08-Oct 23:57 kfoobarb-sd JobId 2858: Job write elapsed time = 14:45:49, >> Transfer rate = 2.702 M Bytes/second > > Are you running an automounter for home directories? Tha

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Freebsd snapshots and complaints "Will not descend"

2011-10-10 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:51:14 -0500, Troy Kocher said: > > Truncated job log: > 08-Oct 09:11 kfoobarb-dir JobId 2858: Start Backup JobId 2858, > Job=foobar_Backup.2011-10-08_08.00.01_01 
 > 08-Oct 09:11 kfoobarb-dir JobId 2858: Using Device "kfoobarbpool" > 
08-Oct 09:10 jailhost-fd JobId 2

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Freebsd snapshots and complaints "Will not descend"

2011-10-10 Thread Troy Kocher
On 10,Oct 2011, at 12:02 PM, David Romerstein wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Troy Kocher > wrote: >> 08-Oct 23:48 jailhost-fd JobId 2858: /mnt/foobar/usr/home/ltartmp is a >> different filesystem. Will not descend from /mnt/foobar/usr into >> /mnt/foobar/usr/home/ltartmp > > From

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Freebsd snapshots and complaints "Will not descend"

2011-10-10 Thread Troy Kocher
> Listers, > > I'm having intermittent issues with a backup job that completes "OK" but > complains saying "Will not descend" into various user folders within a jail. > Over the weekend this job ran twice and on the first occasion it complained > about a larger set than on the second occasio

Re: [Bacula-users] Freebsd snapshots and complaints "Will not descend"

2011-10-10 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:03:58 -0500, Troy Kocher said: > > I'm having intermittent issues with a backup job that completes "OK" but > complains saying "Will not descend" into various user folders within a jail. > Over the weekend this job ran twice and on the first occasion it complained > ab

[Bacula-users] Freebsd snapshots and complaints "Will not descend"

2011-10-10 Thread Troy Kocher
Listers, I'm having intermittent issues with a backup job that completes "OK" but complains saying "Will not descend" into various user folders within a jail. Over the weekend this job ran twice and on the first occasion it complained about a larger set than on the second occasion. Although

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula disk to tape config

2011-10-10 Thread John Drescher
> The reason for this, I supposed, is that this > would require SDs to transfer data over the wire between themselves > while normally data only flows between FDs and SDs. > That is correct. Storage Daemons do not currently communicate. John ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula disk to tape config

2011-10-10 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:13:26 +0200 René Moser wrote: [...] > SD = Storage Device, I guess. I can not migrate between a file storage > device, to a tape storage device? [...] SD stands for Storage Daemon--it's a program which manages one or more storage devices available on the host a particular

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula disk to tape config

2011-10-10 Thread René Moser
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 18:08 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > On Sep 27, 2011, at 12:42 PM, René Moser wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 16:51 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote: > > > >> It sounds like what you're looking for could be implemented as: > >> > >> 1. A normal Full/Differential/Incremental j

Re: [Bacula-users] multiple spool files per job

2011-10-10 Thread Alan Brown
James Harper wrote: > Is there a way to make bacula write multiple spool files per job? Two > would do. What I'm seeing is that 4 jobs start, all hit their spool > limit around the same time, then all wait in a queue until the file is > despooled. The despool happens fairly quickly (much quicker th