Bonjour,
J'ai un serveur Bacula, installé sur une Debian Squeeze.
Le Director, le Storage et la console, sont sur le même serveur appelé :
srvtlx01.
J'ai mis en place le cryptage via TLS, et j'ai ce message d'erreur :
root@SRVTLX01:/etc/bacula/ssl# bconsole
Connecting to Director
Bonjour,
Pour ma part, j'ai eu cette erreur lorsque le common name du
certificat ne correspondait pas au nom de la machine.
Je me suis beaucoup appuy sur ce site pour passer l'ensemble de
clients, du director, de la console et du storage en TLS :
1. Bacula Systems Support Job
great!
2. Bacula Training course
wow!
3. Bacula Release version 5.2.0
no annunciation on bacula.org website? (5.1.0 too..)
it seems a dead project from 2010..
4. No rpms for version 5.2.0
what a pity
5. New Bacula Systems CEO
Congrats :)
ciao
Mauro
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:28:05 +0200, Andrea Venturoli said:
Hello.
This has been brought up several times, but I can only find questions,
not a definite answer.
I have a LTO-4 tape drive on FreeBSD 7.3/amd64.
# camcontrol devlist
TANDBERG LTO-4 HH W519 at scbus0 target 2
Hi everybody,
I was playing around with bacula and noticed that when bat is configured to
connect to a Console Resource it hangs (Bat opens, authenticates with the
server, and then it freezes, it seems it's waiting for a something).
The same configuration works perfectly if I try to connect
On 27.10.2011 15:05, Emanuele Verga wrote:
Hi everybody,
I was playing around with bacula and noticed that when bat is
configured to connect to a Console Resource it hangs (Bat opens,
authenticates with the server, and then it freezes, it seems it's
waiting for a something).
The same
W dniu 26.10.2011 17:09, Kern Sibbald pisze:
3. Bacula Release version 5.2.0
Bacula version 5.2.0 is ready. However, I have been holding it back
because the normal community testing is not happening. The only user
helping us to test is DassIT (thanks very much). This means that the new
Hi,
I have an old 2.4.2 bacula install peacefully running on a few CentOS 5 servers.
I did use Mr Schwarz rpms at the time.
I recently added a CentOS 6 server that now includes bacula 5.0.0.
The 5.0 bacula-fd does not seem to want to talk to the 2.4 bacula-dir:
I get a rejected Hello command.
I have an old 2.4.2 bacula install peacefully running on a few CentOS 5
servers.
I did use Mr Schwarz rpms at the time.
I recently added a CentOS 6 server that now includes bacula 5.0.0.
The 5.0 bacula-fd does not seem to want to talk to the 2.4 bacula-dir:
I get a rejected Hello command.
Mauro,
3. Bacula Release version 5.2.0
no annunciation on bacula.org website? (5.1.0 too..)
it seems a dead project from 2010..
Once it is officially out I will put up a message. 5.1.0 is the development
branch, so there
isn't much to write about.
The project is not at all dead, but item
On Oct 27, 2011, at 3:15 AM, Mauro Colorio wrote:
1. Bacula Systems Support Job
great!
2. Bacula Training course
wow!
3. Bacula Release version 5.2.0
no annunciation on bacula.org website? (5.1.0 too..)
it seems a dead project from 2010..
4. No rpms for version 5.2.0
what
11 matches
Mail list logo