Hi all!
If I restore only files from one certain incremental job, attributes of some
directories are wrongly
restored, as I understand it's because of these directories was not backed up
in this job but only
files somewhere in depth, so bacula can't restore these attributes only from
this
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:22:41 +0400
Vladimir Vassiliev v...@edu.yar.ru wrote:
If I restore only files from one certain incremental job, attributes
of some directories are wrongly restored, as I understand it's
because of these directories was not backed up in this job but only
files somewhere
15.12.2011 15:04, Konstantin Khomoutov пишет:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:22:41 +0400
Vladimir Vassilievv...@edu.yar.ru wrote:
If I restore only files from one certain incremental job, attributes
of some directories are wrongly restored, as I understand it's
because of these directories was not
I'm happy to address all the package issues people might encounter and
I'm available to ideas or constructive criticism regarding choices or
features missing.
When I will get enough feedback that the approach used inside the
package is right I will try to see if some patches could be
Hello,
I've updated the package on top of what is currently in Fedora.
In there we have this post scriptlet:
%pre common
/usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula /dev/null || :
/usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \
-c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula
It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora
packaging guidelines:
Right:) Not EL requirements.
I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel
commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula
mantainers and good reasons to do so.
Is there any
using this bacula-sd.conf, the best I get is about 2.4GB a minute. I'm
not working with network backups, this is just a straight raid 5 to
lto-4. I'm now thinking that my db (mysql) or raid is the
drag/slowdown since I can get over 180MBs with btape. Any suggestions
welcomes, I feel I've exhausted
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM, gary artim gar...@gmail.com wrote:
using this bacula-sd.conf, the best I get is about 2.4GB a minute. I'm
not working with network backups, this is just a straight raid 5 to
lto-4. I'm now thinking that my db (mysql) or raid is the
drag/slowdown since I can get
no, full, doing a mod on run command in bconsole to force full backup
on every test. cheers
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:21 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM, gary artim gar...@gmail.com wrote:
using this bacula-sd.conf, the best I get is about 2.4GB a
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:25 PM, gary artim gar...@gmail.com wrote:
no, full, doing a mod on run command in bconsole to force full backup
on every test. cheers
Is the bacula database on the same array as the source?
John
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: gary artim [mailto:gar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 19:09
An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Gary Artim
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] tuning lto-4
using this bacula-sd.conf, the best I get is about 2.4GB a minute. I'm
no, seperate drive. g.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:26 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:25 PM, gary artim gar...@gmail.com wrote:
no, full, doing a mod on run command in bconsole to force full backup
on every test. cheers
Is the bacula database on the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:24 PM, gary artim gar...@gmail.com wrote:
no, seperate drive. g.
Try enabling attribute spooling. Like the other poster said.
John
--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server
no seperate drive.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:26 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:25 PM, gary artim gar...@gmail.com wrote:
no, full, doing a mod on run command in bconsole to force full backup
on every test. cheers
Is the bacula database on the same
will do, interestingly I picked another slot on my autochanger
(different lto vol) and got (see below), running a peak time no less.
Last nite I ran a 9pm, the hours of the dead, and was getting about
2.4gb min, today 2.66gb min. -- go figure...
15-Dec 10:58 bacula-dir JobId 1: Bacula bacula-dir
Interesting...I followed the job and got a big increase in writing the
tape using Spool Attributes = yes, went from 2.66GB/minute toe
3.8GB/minute, but but the job took longer to finish, close to 50
minutes writing out attribute data to mysql. Looks like putting the
sql on a ssd would help. Nice
16 matches
Mail list logo
