Il giorno lun, 07/05/2012 alle 12.45 -0700, Tim Krieger ha scritto:
> Hi Gandalf, while I do not have exactly the same requirements, possibly the
> information below will be helpful.
>
> You do not mention it but I am assuming you are doing backups to disk.
Yes, actually i'm doing backup to dis
Hi.
Does anyone know how to interpret Max Time directives from
http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/New_Features_in_3_0_0.html#SECTION00132417000
?
Should the "Max Run Time" indicate "Run Time" + "Blocked" (Max Wait Time) +
"Run Time"?
Also, "Max Run Sched Time" is said to
Hi guys,
I recently have this error with one of my Windows 2003 servers. (log pasted at
the end) The configuration has no changes and it fails since one month ago.
Nothing changed, the authentication keys are the same and that backup worked
about one year without any problem.
I tried to restart
Il giorno mar, 08/05/2012 alle 10.57 +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta ha
scritto:
> I have tons of Full Pools that need to by copied to tape.
> Should I edit each pool and add the Next Pool option or should I use a
> single configuration that will copy all full pools in a single run?
I have some updat
Am 08.05.2012 12:46, schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta:
Il giorno mar, 08/05/2012 alle 10.57 +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta ha
scritto:
I have tons of Full Pools that need to by copied to tape.
Should I edit each pool and add the Next Pool option or should I use a
si
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I had to remove several clients (fds) from my bacula setup and I found
>> > no intructions on how to do this properly. Can someone please help me out?
>> > What I want to achieve is that all database entries related to those
>> > clients (clients, jobs, files,...) will be rem
--Duilio Poggi OnetoEnviado usando Nextel EmailFrom: "Arnau Coll" Date: Tue May 08 10:51:16 GMT 2012To: "bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon
Hi guys,
I recently have this error with one of my Windows 2003 servers.
Dear all,
we are trying to backup our QNAP TS-859 NAS device running Bacula-fd 3.0.3
which we installed by the ipkg tool. Our director is under SLES 11 with
Bacula 5.2.3
and MySQL 5.0.67. Unfortunately we are getting these error messages:
JobId 4067: Start Backup JobId 4067, Job=qnap-1Backup.201
On 08/05/12 13:56, xunil321 wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> we are trying to backup our QNAP TS-859 NAS device running Bacula-fd 3.0.3
> which we installed by the ipkg tool. Our director is under SLES 11 with
> Bacula 5.2.3
> and MySQL 5.0.67. Unfortunately we are getting these error messages:
>
> JobId 406
Hey Gandalf,
The client should be the file daemon that has your tape drive attached I would
think, that is what mine is defined as. I have not seen the message waiting
for volume, I would think bacula should have emailed a message to the operator
for intervention tho, possibly it will contain
> On Tue, 08 May 2012 11:47:27 +0800, Alex Lucas said:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have been searching bacula documentation and there seem to be some
> incomplete info about types (levels) of backup.
>
> When I run a job I get a list of the following level choices:
>
> Levels:
> 1: Full
>
Could you please provide a link to the most up to date page/doc about
VirtualFull (including setup instructions).
RE the "Since" type of backup -- if not implemented it should be hidden,
no? :)
A related question:
We have a large mail server to backup and full backup is too long hence
there is a
I'm having trouble connecting to a Quantum LTO-5 HH with LSI SAS HBA.
I've updated all firmwares per LSI support and can see the device quite clearly.
I've run the tests and they all pass swimmingly.
[root@ohara log]# lsscsi
[0:0:0:0]tapeQUANTUM ULTRIUM 53085 /dev/st0
[root
Op 8/05/2012 11:06, Silver Salonen schreef:
> Hi.
>
> Does anyone know how to interpret Max Time directives from
> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/New_Features_in_3_0_0.html#SECTION00132417000
> ?
>
> Should the "Max Run Time" indicate "Run Time" + "Blocked" (Max Wait Ti
14 matches
Mail list logo
