Il 31/05/2012 21:09, Domen Kožar ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm pleased to announce Almir 0.1.2. This is mostly a bugfix release.
>
> About Almir (bacula web interface):
> http://readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest/
> How to upgrade:
> http://readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest/userguide.html#upgr
So I've got a full backup job that takes more than a day to complete. To
keep a second full backup from getting started while the first one is still
completing I've set the following in the Job definitions:
Allow Duplicate Jobs = no
Cancel Queued Duplicates = yes
However to handle network conn
Hi folks,
this is my 2nd attempt to configure bacula 5.2.6 to run more than one
copy job at a time, and for the life of me I cannot find the error in
my config. Parallel backup jobs (both full and incr.) work like a
charm, but for some reason bacula refuses to run more than one copy
job from disk
Hi folks,
while we're at it, I was wondering what's happening when bacula copies
an on-disk (software-compressed) job to tape? Will it decompress the
data or will it simply transfer the copy to tape as-is?
All the best,
Uwe
Hello,
the repository has been updated to 5.2.7.
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/
Please read the included readme at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
For now, until Fedora rawhide diverges too much from Fedora 17; the newly
created Fedora 17 r
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> this is my 2nd attempt to configure bacula 5.2.6 to run more than one
> copy job at a time, and for the life of me I cannot find the error in
> my config. Parallel backup jobs (both full and incr.) work like a
> charm, but for s
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:59:53AM -0400, John Drescher wrote:
>
> Don't disk volumes have just about the same restrictions as a tape
> volume? Meaning you can not load more than 1 disk volume into the same
> device at a time. You also can not read or write to different parts of
> the same volume
> then why do parallel backup jobs to the same disk volume work
> just fine?
Because they append at the same position of the volume interleaving
blocks from each backup job. Think of a disk device as a tape drive.
John
-
Jon,
I believe I posted this same issue back in April and didn't get any
replies. I never did submit it as a bug but it does seem to be a bug to me.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4F8ECD71.8080203%40mtl.mit.edu&forum_name=bacula-users
Perhaps I'll go ahead and post a
On 5/31/2012 9:19 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone tried to use an SSD drive to house the MySQL database for
> Bacula and understand the
> performance differences, if any? I am wondering if it will provide a
> significant speed boost to running it
> on disk or not. Any clues might be v
On 06/04/2012 11:04 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
>
> On 5/31/2012 9:19 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone tried to use an SSD drive to house the MySQL database for
>> Bacula and understand the
>> performance differences, if any? I am wondering if it will provide a
>> significant speed boost
On 6/4/2012 12:06 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 11:04 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
>> I moved a bacula db from a RAID1 array of two WD RE-4 drives to an old
>> 80 GB Intel X25-M, which is not one of the fastest compared to more
>> recent SSDs. However it has random read and write performanc
I am new to bacula and have been monitoring this list for the last 6 months in
addition to reading the available documentation. I have bacula v5.2.6 packages
from epel-bacula on RHEL 6.2 x64 platform. The autochanger is a Spectralogic
T950 with 6 tape drives with a fiber switch between the bac
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Clark, Patricia A. wrote:
> I am new to bacula and have been monitoring this list for the last 6 months
> in addition to reading the available documentation. I have bacula v5.2.6
> packages from epel-bacula on RHEL 6.2 x64 platform. The autochanger is a
> Spect
On 06/04/2012 03:00 PM, Josh Fisher wrote:
> It makes a big difference for database-only stuff, like file selection
> during restore, pruning volumes, etc. I suppose if you have a lot of
> really fast servers to backup, then database performance would be a big
> factor for backups as well. My ob
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 15:30 -0400, Clark, Patricia A. wrote:
> I am new to bacula and have been monitoring this list for the last 6
> months in addition to reading the available documentation. I have
> bacula v5.2.6 packages from epel-bacula on RHEL 6.2 x64 platform. The
> autochanger is a Spectr
Hey João,
Am 01.06.2012 18:38, schrieb João Alberto Kuchnier:
> It seems to be a tape misconfiguration but later, it shows a network
> problem. Why the tape was marked full before getting to its capacity
> limit? Is there another way to format these LTO-2 tapes?
Try to fix your drive settings f
17 matches
Mail list logo
