Re: [Bacula-users] Automatic Tape Recycling

2012-07-26 Thread Sven Tegethoff
On 25.07.2012 17:50, Phil Stracchino wrote: i think we need to understand more about the use cycle for these volumes. Are these weekly tapes written to once per week with a single job or set of jobs, or are they continuously appended to over the course of a week? Let's just take a look at

Re: [Bacula-users] Automatic Tape Recycling

2012-07-26 Thread Sven Tegethoff
On 25.07.2012 17:22, John Drescher wrote: Yes, I did. My problem is, The use duration is checked and the Used status is set only at the end of a job that writes to the particular volume, and not at the moment when bacula decides whether to overwrite or to append to the volume. Confused.

Re: [Bacula-users] Automatic Tape Recycling

2012-07-26 Thread Phil Stracchino
-dir JobId 1306: Max configured use duration=82,800 sec. exceeded. Marking Volume INCR-20120725-04:30 as +Used. 26-Jul 04:30 babylon4-dir JobId 1306: Created new Volume INCR-20120726-04:30 in catalog. 26-Jul 04:30 babylon4-dir JobId 1306: Using Device FileStorage 26-Jul 04:30 babylon4-sd JobId 1306

[Bacula-users] Multiple Storages in Job Resource

2012-07-26 Thread Jummo
: Start Backup JobId 889, Job=client2.example.com.2012-07-26_16.48.08_54 26-Jul 16:48 bacula.example.com-dir JobId 889: Created new Volume client2.example.com-fd-new_FullPool-20120726-1648-889 in catalog. 26-Jul 16:48 bacula.example.com-dir JobId 889: Error: sql_create.c:424 Volume client2

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storages in Job Resource

2012-07-26 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Jummo ju...@devio.us wrote: Hi, I use backup to disk to backup my clients and I hit the slow restore problem when backup jobs run concurrently and use the same storage device/volume. The backup window is small and therefore jobs must run at the same time.

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storages in Job Resource

2012-07-26 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:26 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Jummo ju...@devio.us wrote: Hi, I use backup to disk to backup my clients and I hit the slow restore problem when backup jobs run concurrently and use the same storage device/volume.

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storages in Job Resource

2012-07-26 Thread Georges
Hello Message du 26/07/12 17:29 De : John Drescher A : Jummo Copie à : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storages in Job Resource On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:26 AM, John Drescher wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Jummo wrote: Hi, I use

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storages in Job Resource

2012-07-26 Thread John Drescher
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vchanger/ IMHO, there is really no need to use that tool. Bacula is able to manage virtual autochanger by itself... Hmm. Is that a new feature in 5.2.X? John -- Live Security Virtual

[Bacula-users] Bacula base jobs

2012-07-26 Thread robi1a
Hello I'm trying to implement deduplication in my bacula installation but I didn't understand how does it fit into my installation. The bacula documentation about base jobs are not very usable (my opinion). Further I spent some hours in google but I didn't find any helpful hint. My problem:

Re: [Bacula-users] fileset: second eyes needed

2012-07-26 Thread Martin Simmons
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:34:08 -0400 (EDT), Steve Thompson said: I have a large file system (/mnt/home, 60TB) whose backups are split into multiple jobs. Two jobs in particular: one to backup all directories whose names begin with s except for st123, and a second job to backup just st123:

[Bacula-users] Verify VolumeToCatalog still broken?

2012-07-26 Thread John Drescher
I just tried a verify job level VolumeToCatalog and it appears that bacula is wrongly verifying the last completed job on the client instead of the job I wanted. datastore3-fd Version: 5.2.5 (26 January 2012) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu gentoo Daemon started 12-Jul-12 14:26. Jobs: run=19 running=0.

Re: [Bacula-users] Verify VolumeToCatalog still broken?

2012-07-26 Thread John Drescher
Here is the log: Build OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu gentoo JobId: 29107 Job:VerifyVolume_Gladwin-ds3-Job.2012-07-26_15.28.54_09 FileSet:Gladwin-ds3-fs Verify Level: VolumeToCatalog Client:

Re: [Bacula-users] Verify VolumeToCatalog still broken?

2012-07-26 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:14 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: Here is the log: Build OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu gentoo JobId: 29107 Job:VerifyVolume_Gladwin-ds3-Job.2012-07-26_15.28.54_09 FileSet:

Re: [Bacula-users] Verify VolumeToCatalog still broken?

2012-07-26 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:19 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:14 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: Here is the log: Build OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu gentoo JobId: 29107 Job:

[Bacula-users] Building rpms from bacula.spec troubles

2012-07-26 Thread Robert Hartzell
I'm trying to build RPM's from the bacula.spec file included with the 5.2.10 source on CentOS 6.3 and have ran into several problems. rpmbuild -ba --define build_centos6 1 --define build_mysql 1 SPECS/bacula.spec results in this error: error: line 457: Empty tag: Distribution: which I

[Bacula-users] Copy Job Head Scratcher... Next Pool

2012-07-26 Thread NetCetera Lists
I am working on setting up a Copy job to a tape autoloader - and am having an issue with the Next Pool directive requirement. I am picking the jobs to copy - last Full for a number of existing clients - using an SQL Query. The query is working fine and providing the correct job ids as input.

[Bacula-users] accurate mode and full backup

2012-07-26 Thread d tbsky
hi: I use accurate mode for incremental or differential backups. but when incremental level upgrade to full level (like fist time backup) , will bacula disable accurate mode automatically? I check the backup log and find the line accurate = yes even when bacula is doing full backup. should