On 11/08/12 20:56, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan,
FWIW I'm seeing the same thing. Bacula has a tape active in the loader
already, then decides to grab another one out of the scratch pool. Once
it's in this state, it cannot be convinced to use the existing tape(s)
with append status
Right now i hav
On 09/08/12 09:27, Jummo wrote:
> During the backup one copy job already run and use the first tape drive.
> In the output I can see that 4 Jobs runs concurrently (one was the copy
> job). A little bit later I noticed that 2 jobs despooling data at the same
> time. Will this means the jobs are mixe
I started two backups maybe 12 hours ago. Normally full backups run 1-2
h max, but this suddenly...
From database I see no locks, but they geep inserting to batch -table.
I have 12 gigabytes RAM, and given couple gigs to MySQL too. Database
should not be bottle neck.
How can it be so slow. Two
On Aug 10, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Eric Chennells wrote:
> I have this problem on one of my tape drives, it is a single drive, no
> autoloader.
>
> The job is partially completed and it needs a new tape, and it requests for
> me to label a new one. I have a tape that as far as I can see is perfect
