Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with Bat crashing

2012-09-03 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 20120902 om 09:53 schreef Michael D. Wood: > From: lst_ho...@kwsoft.de [mailto:lst_ho...@kwsoft.de] > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 4:31 PM > > Zitat von "Michael D. Wood" : > > > > > Has anyone else ran across this issue? > > > > > > Faulting application bat.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula SD crashing, traceback stops at linux-vdso.so.1

2012-09-03 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 09/03/12 18:50, Steve Costaras wrote: > > when I had problems here, I also did not see hard errors w/ application code, > just slow performance (70MB/s or so). When I ran the manufacturer's drive > test code it did show up internal issues (compression/crc/etc not withing > manufacturer spe

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula SD crashing, traceback stops at linux-vdso.so.1

2012-09-03 Thread Steve Costaras
when I had problems here, I also did not see hard errors w/ application code, just slow performance (70MB/s or so). When I ran the manufacturer's drive test code it did show up internal issues (compression/crc/etc not withing manufacturer specs). Not saying that this is your problem at all

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula SD crashing, traceback stops at linux-vdso.so.1

2012-09-03 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 09/03/12 17:26, Steve Costaras wrote: > > Would also verify your drive. I've had issues with LTO drives that just > flake out over time and required replacement from the vendors in the past. > Most vendors supply a test utility. Running a btape write test right this moment. (And for the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula SD crashing, traceback stops at linux-vdso.so.1

2012-09-03 Thread Steve Costaras
Would also verify your drive. I've had issues with LTO drives that just flake out over time and required replacement from the vendors in the past. Most vendors supply a test utility. As for the block size limit increase, that's not correct. Even though it was stated in the change logs tha

Re: [Bacula-users] Map storage to multiple devices

2012-09-03 Thread John Drescher
>> My company has 2 LTO4 autochanger tape libraries (1 drive per >> library, 20TB max per library). >> Size to backup is about 30TB. >> I would divide this job down into much smaller chunks if possible. >> As backup size does not fit a single library, I simply would like to >> span my storage usi

Re: [Bacula-users] Map storage to multiple devices

2012-09-03 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Vincent Miszczak : > Hi guys, > > I'm looking at Bacula for future backup software for my company. > I've already use it for simple cases, and now I'm looking to use it > in production. > > My company has 2 LTO4 autochanger tape libraries (1 drive per > library, 20TB max per library

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula SD crashing, traceback stops at linux-vdso.so.1

2012-09-03 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 09/03/12 11:51, Phil Stracchino wrote: > All of a sudden, my Bacula-5.2.10 storage daemon keeps crashing with the > following error reported: Preliminary analysis at this point appears to indicate that it is a REALLY bad idea on an LTO drive to have bacula-sd's configured max block size not an

[Bacula-users] Bacula SD crashing, traceback stops at linux-vdso.so.1

2012-09-03 Thread Phil Stracchino
All of a sudden, my Bacula-5.2.10 storage daemon keeps crashing with the following error reported: warning: Could not load shared library symbols for linux-vdso.so.1. Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"? [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7f8c66ffd700 (LW

[Bacula-users] Map storage to multiple devices

2012-09-03 Thread Vincent Miszczak
Hi guys, I'm looking at Bacula for future backup software for my company. I've already use it for simple cases, and now I'm looking to use it in production. My company has 2 LTO4 autochanger tape libraries (1 drive per library, 20TB max per library). Size to backup is about 30TB. As backup siz

Re: [Bacula-users] job expiration question

2012-09-03 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > > John, > > I wanted to try something to get my 2TB tapes recycle faster. > > Current configuration: > > pool { > name = server-archive > Pool Type = Backup > Autoprune = no > Recycle = no > Volume R