Zitat von Carsten Jensen :
> Sorry for answering again, accidently hit send while not finished
>
> to compare an LTO4 drive with an Ultra320 controller
> I get around 55MB/sec
>
> my guess is that the LTO3 drive should deliver around 30-40MB/sec
> with the right controller (ultra320).
> (pay note
Dear Carsten,
In message <508056a2.3020...@tomse.dk> you wrote:
> an Adaptec 2940 is usually only a SCSI-II device with 10MB/Sec
>
> the 2940UW performs 40MB/sec
> these are maximum bus transfers
It's the 2940UW...
> pressing CTRL-A when the SCSI bios tells you to, you should be able to
> set t
Sorry for answering again, accidently hit send while not finished
to compare an LTO4 drive with an Ultra320 controller
I get around 55MB/sec
my guess is that the LTO3 drive should deliver around 30-40MB/sec
with the right controller (ultra320).
(pay note to that there usually are 2 models, a fast
an Adaptec 2940 is usually only a SCSI-II device with 10MB/Sec
the 2940UW performs 40MB/sec
these are maximum bus transfers
If you haven't made any special modifications to the driver/kernel, then
linux uses the fastest speed possible delivered by the restrictions of
the host adapter.
going ali
Hello,
apologies in advance - this may be a bit off topic, but I guess I find
most experts for such a problem on this list...
I see very poor performance with HP Ultrium LTO3 drive, which is
attached over SCSI to a Linux box (using a Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI
adapter). It seems I cannot get more
On 18/10/12 13:37, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> These are my results:
>
> [root@superback ~]# tapeinfo -f /dev/sg0
> Medium Type: Not Loaded
> Is "DataCompEnabled: no" correct even after running " mt -f /dev/nst0
> compression 1" ?
Yes. There's no tape loaded, so it can'
I did on the tape that is full
2012/10/18, John Drescher :
>> These are my results:
>>
>> smartctl version 5.36 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce
>> Allen
>> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> Device: IBM HH LTO Gen 3 Version: 76B0
>> Serial number
> These are my results:
>
> smartctl version 5.36 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce
> Allen
> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
>
> Device: IBM HH LTO Gen 3 Version: 76B0
> Serial number: 1020024392
> Device type: tape
> Transport protocol: SAS
> Local
2012/10/17 Stephen Thompson :
>
>
>
>
> I recently found out that I had a bad tape drive.
>
> With the tape in the drive run the following and see if it says there
> are errors:
>
> smartctl -a /dev/nst0
>
>
> If there are errors, it's wasting tape and hence less capacity.
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
> On 10
Hi Dan,
Thanks a lot for your help, it has gone much clearer to me.
I still have a few questions left:
Le 17/10/2012 21:55, Dan Langille a écrit :
On Oct 17, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Florent Krieg wrote:
Hi there!
We are currently using bacula for a while (3/4 years maybe) to backup
many
servers
Op 20121016 om 10:35 schreef Константин Поветкин:
> Hi, all!
Hello again,
> After a while backup job reports: Socket error. Err = Connection reset by
> peer.
>
> I`ve read
> http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=faq#my_backup_starts_but_dies_after_a_while_with_connection_reset_by_peer_error
> a
All our clients have a bconsole.conf like that, each with their own password. I
can remove those bconsole.conf files from the clients, but then my clients
wouldn’t be able to do restores of their own files either. What I’m
specifically looking for is a way to configure things such that client X
Op 20121017 om 17:15 schreef "Jürgen Ecker":
> Hallo,
Hello in english,
> Ich habe hier ein seltsames Problem. Sobald ich den bacula-director
> Dienst neustarte führt mir Bacula keine Jobs mehr aus.
Translated: No jobs are executed after director restart.
> Wenn sie
> abgebrochen würden, dann h
13 matches
Mail list logo
