Re: [Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

On 5/01/2013 1:42 AM, tonyalbers wrote: > Spooling is definetely off. > > using tar to dump the directory 3 times now. > Kern Sibbald's post makes all this redundant. Wait for the Enterprise version, then wait for it perhaps become available in the community version. Cheers,

Re: [Bacula-users] Running Verify Jobs

> > > Hi, > > Hello! > we use priority to tell bacula to run verify jobs only after backup jobs. > > greets > > yeah, that would work too, but since I have multiple storage systems (three tapes devices), sometimes I could run a verify job on one storage while bacula is performing a normal backup

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring pruned files

> > > > I am trying to restore some files from pruned volumes and I am having > > a bit of difficulties. I did run bscan like: > > > > bscan -b h34.bsr -h localhost -P -v -s -m -c bacula-sd.conf > > H23- DataStore-full > > > > Bscan finished normally and I went into bconsole, there I started the >

Re: [Bacula-users] Running Verify Jobs

Am 02.01.2013 11:49, schrieb Rodrigo Renie Braga: > Hello list! > > I'd like to start using Verify Jobs and I'd would like your opinion on > how to automatically run it daily after all normal backup jobs have > finished. > > So far, what I came up with is creating a second job (a verify job) > for

Re: [Bacula-users] restore from expired tapes

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > John, > > I just have one more question. If a tape has expired because of the volume > retention period and the job record is in intact in the catalog will the > incremental backup for a given client continue

[Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

Hello, Concerning the email thread on deduplication: As you have heard from Radoslaw, Bacula Enterprise now has two directions it is going. The first is with what I call "the dedup friendly" format or Aligned Volumes, which when enabled, causes Bacula to write the Volume in a format that is very

Re: [Bacula-users] restore from expired tapes

John, I just have one more question. If a tape has expired because of the volume retention period and the job record is in intact in the catalog will the incremental backup for a given client continue or will it be upgraded to a "FULL back-up" because the tape has expired? Thank you. Uthra -

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula compilation problem on OpenIndiana

On 01/ 4/13 03:00 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: Marco, Thanks! I figured the --disable-conio part and it compiled. What would --with-readline do? Explictly enable readline support. But as --disable-conio makes sure conio doesn't get enabled and readline support will look under /usr/include/read

Re: [Bacula-users] restore from expired tapes

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > John, > > We have only volume retention set for the pools. I have not set job and file > retention for the different pools. So, in my case when a tape is expired the > catalog record remains intact until such

[Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

Spooling is definetely off. using tar to dump the directory 3 times now. 1. Before first tar: [root@dkarhbus02 download]# sdfscli -volume-info Volume Capacity : 1.5 TB Volume Current Size : 681 B Volume Max Percentage Full : Unlimited Volume Duplicate Data Written : 0 B Volume Unique Data Writte

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula compilation problem on OpenIndiana

Marco, Thanks! I figured the --disable-conio part and it compiled. What would --with-readline do? Boris. On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Marco van Wieringen wrote: > Boris Epstein gmail.com> writes: > > > > Would anybody have any idea why this would happen? > Either apply > > > http://www.ba

Re: [Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

On 04.01.2013 15:11, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: Hello, 2013/1/4 Silver Salonen mailto:sil...@serverock.ee>> 3. Partial restores can only be made to the client that did the backup, not to another client if necessary(redirected recover). Not true. In our implement

[Bacula-users] Moving clients to a new catalog

Hi folks, we're trying to move a client to new, separate mysql catalog. This has worked mostly fine but when the job finishes, we get the following error: JobId 51080: Warning: Error updating job record. sql_update.c:202 Update failed: affected_rows=0 for UPDATE J\ ob SET JobStatus='T',EndTime

Re: [Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

On 04.01.2013 12:42, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: Hello, 2013/1/4 tonyalbers > Hi Silver, The downside of client-side dedupe is actually a combination of several things. 1. The client does the dedupe calculations etc. this means that it

Re: [Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

On 4/01/2013 8:30 PM, tonyalbers wrote: > Ok, it seems to me that there is some confusion of which kind of dedupe I'm > referring to. > > What I'm talking about is variable-length block-based target dedupe, that is, > the DXi or DataDomain box receives all data from the client via the backup > s

Re: [Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

Hello, 2013/1/4 tonyalbers > Hi Silver, > > The downside of client-side dedupe is actually a combination of several > things. > > 1. The client does the dedupe calculations etc. this means that it takes > CPU resources on the client which it might not have. > Yes it could be a problem in some c

[Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

Hi Silver, The downside of client-side dedupe is actually a combination of several things. 1. The client does the dedupe calculations etc. this means that it takes CPU resources on the client which it might not have. 2. Sometimes, client-side dedupe is chosen because of bandwidth limitations to

Re: [Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

On 04.01.2013 11:30, tonyalbers wrote: > Ok, it seems to me that there is some confusion of which kind of dedupe I'm > referring to. > > What I'm talking about is variable-length block-based target dedupe, that is, > the DXi or DataDomain box receives all data from the client via the backup > se

[Bacula-users] Plans for support block-based dedupe?

Ok, it seems to me that there is some confusion of which kind of dedupe I'm referring to. What I'm talking about is variable-length block-based target dedupe, that is, the DXi or DataDomain box receives all data from the client via the backup server (bacula SD) and then handles the deduplicatio