Re: [Bacula-users] bscan will take...34 years!?!?

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Stauffer _g
> > 2) About how long could the bscan take? > > I'm getting regular status updates like: > > 21-Feb 17:04 bscan JobId 0: End of file 1070 on device "LTO5-0" > > (/dev/st0), Volume "L50001" > > After two hours, it's up to file 1070. > > I believe that is the volume file. Which usually is 1 GB.

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan will take...34 years!?!?

2013-02-21 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Michael Stauffer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > So I've finally got my bscan running after your help in previous posts > - thanks. But am worried that it's on track to take 34 years to > complete!! > > I'm recreating a database from tapes after a hard-drive corruption.

[Bacula-users] bscan will take...34 years!?!?

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Stauffer
Hi everyone, So I've finally got my bscan running after your help in previous posts - thanks. But am worried that it's on track to take 34 years to complete!! I'm recreating a database from tapes after a hard-drive corruption. I'm using bacula 3.0.1 (I'll be upgrading in ~3 months, but first nee

[Bacula-users] "Latest Files" link on bacula.org

2013-02-21 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, the "current files" link on the bacula website still points to release 5.2.6 which might confuse some people ;) All the best, Uwe -- NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA -- Everyone ha

Re: [Bacula-users] How to check volumes integrity and dimension

2013-02-21 Thread Carlo Filippetto
Are you talking about the error message that says the number of volume > files differs from the catalog? > > > I am trying to figure out what you mean by "volume dimension" as that > is not what I would call it in english. > > John > Sorry Volumes SIZE!! May be that the error is " volume files d

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan fails: cannot find device in config file

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Stauffer _g
Thanks Radoslaw, So if I bscan just one of the two Devices corresponding to the autochanger (/dev/st0 and /dev/st1), it will cycle through all the tapes still? I figure the two devices correspond to the two drives within the changer, so accessing either will work? At first I'd thought they migh

Re: [Bacula-users] How to check volumes integrity and dimension

2013-02-21 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Carlo Filippetto wrote: > Hi, > I migrate bacula to new infrastracture. In several other time when the jobs > run I had an orror about the difference of volume's dimension. > Ther's a way to check it before? > Are you talking about the error message that says the

Re: [Bacula-users] Corrupted catalog on bad drive - please help!

2013-02-21 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/21/13 03:44, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > What strategy would you suggest to "shrink" an innodb-based DB short > of dumping, dropping and re-importing it? I feel more comfortable with > the file-base approach probably because it resembles the dearly loved > MyISAM behaviour ;) That "dearly loved

Re: [Bacula-users] How to check volumes integrity and dimension

2013-02-21 Thread Novosielski, Ryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/21/2013 10:15 AM, Novosielski, Ryan wrote: > On 02/21/2013 05:54 AM, Carlo Filippetto wrote: >> Hi, I migrate bacula to new infrastracture. In several other >> time when the jobs run I had an orror about the difference of >> volume's dimension. T

Re: [Bacula-users] How to check volumes integrity and dimension

2013-02-21 Thread Novosielski, Ryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/21/2013 05:54 AM, Carlo Filippetto wrote: > Hi, I migrate bacula to new infrastracture. In several other time > when the jobs run I had an orror about the difference of volume's > dimension. Ther's a way to check it before? Seems to me this is w

[Bacula-users] odd problems backup thru firewall, 1 server ok, 1 fails

2013-02-21 Thread goorooj
thank you, found out where the problem was: the webserver did not work the way it was intended, that´s why it worked. it had on the webserver from a forgotten tomcat connect to an application server in the LAN a route defined to the private network via the firewall and a rule on the firewall. to

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan fails: cannot find device in config file

2013-02-21 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/2/21 Michael Stauffer > Hi, > > I'm at last ready to recreate my catalog after a disk failure. I've > posted previously about preparing for this. I've got a new fresh DB > setup but bscan is failing like so: > > ./bscan -V* -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf -v -s -m /dev/changer > > Yo

Re: [Bacula-users] FW: difficulty reading tapes after upgrade 3.0.2 -> 5.2.12

2013-02-21 Thread GILES Stephen
After continued testing with other volumes they all read fine. I tried bacula again which was able to mount and read the volumes successfully. However, after a reboot, bacula reverted to it's previous state of not being able to read the tapes via either bls, or via the normal bacula-sd interactio

Re: [Bacula-users] How precisely does bacula decide what to archive

2013-02-21 Thread Durand Toto
Hi all, First of all, thanks once more Dan. > Hi, > > > > Im trying to use bacula but for space reasons I can only do > > incremental backups so I need to make sure that I archive everything. > > > > I see two alternatives: > > * Bacula in normal mode ensuring that all files are considered >

Re: [Bacula-users] FW: difficulty reading tapes after upgrade 3.0.2 -> 5.2.12

2013-02-21 Thread GILES Stephen
I have tried the bls with the archive device. The file read OK and it displayed the label on the tape. I When I try the same command on the actual tape, the tape does list. Output follows : [root@iota tmp]# mt -f /dev/nst0 rewind [root@iota tmp]# bls -d 200 -j -v -V A

[Bacula-users] How to check volumes integrity and dimension

2013-02-21 Thread Carlo Filippetto
Hi, I migrate bacula to new infrastracture. In several other time when the jobs run I had an orror about the difference of volume's dimension. Ther's a way to check it before? Thank's --- Carlo -- Everyone hates slow webs

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula version 5.2.13 released

2013-02-21 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Simone Caronni : > On 21 February 2013 10:32, wrote: > >> Hm, Ubuntu 12.04 ships with Qt version 4.8.1 and i'm for sure not fond >> of replacing it by source compiled Qt version. What is the reason for >> 4.8.4 instead of > 4.8.0?? >> > > Bug fixing on the qt side, probably. The minimu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula version 5.2.13 released

2013-02-21 Thread Simone Caronni
On 21 February 2013 10:32, wrote: > Hm, Ubuntu 12.04 ships with Qt version 4.8.1 and i'm for sure not fond > of replacing it by source compiled Qt version. What is the reason for > 4.8.4 instead of > 4.8.0?? > Bug fixing on the qt side, probably. The minimum version required by the code to compi

[Bacula-users] Bacula version 5.2.13 released

2013-02-21 Thread kern
Andreas, Although Qt is the best GUI from a programmer's point of view that I have ever used, it is terribly non-compatible between versions, and it is sufficiently complicated that it still has a significant number of stability (bug) issues. Thus we try to keep bat on the most stable and most

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula version 5.2.13 released

2013-02-21 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Kern Sibbald : > Hello, > > Bacula Community Release: > > This is to let you know that we have released Bacula version 5.2.13 to > Source Forge. It is also in the git repository. You will find > a summary of the release, which has 20 bug fixes at the bottom of this > email. > > Importa

Re: [Bacula-users] Corrupted catalog on bad drive - please help!

2013-02-21 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:50:14AM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > > Also make sure you have the innodb_tables_as_files option set, > > otherwise you db will be one huge unmanageable blob that can't be > > reduced in size after a while by dumping / importing again. > > Whoa there, Nellie. Make