Thanks to YOU Kern for bringing such a good open source backup solution to
the community.
And thanks for this status update, it give us more detail on what we
already know ... Bacula project is still alive.
Best regards
Davide
On Nov 25, 2013 5:50 PM, "Kern Sibbald" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I woul
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, jackbroni
wrote:
> Doesn't backing up the catalog into a Bacula Pool of volumes defeat the
> purpose as it would be inconvenient to retrieve the catalog in the case of
> failure?
>
>
Yes, it certainly could be. You'll notice the default RunAfter job for th
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:37 PM, jackbroni
wrote:
> Doesn't backing up the catalog into a Bacula Pool of volumes defeat the
> purpose as it would be inconvenient to retrieve the catalog in the case of
> failure?
>
> Sure it could be useful to have a catalog snapshow, but in the event of
> failu
Doesn't backing up the catalog into a Bacula Pool of volumes defeat the purpose
as it would be inconvenient to retrieve the catalog in the case of failure?
Sure it could be useful to have a catalog snapshow, but in the event of failure
perhaps it would be useful to store just a synced version of
hi!
Please forgive newbyness I've been working on getting Bacula up and running
across a network backing up to a hard drive on a "server" machine for both
itself and a couple of other PCs.
My "server" is a RAID1 configuration using Ubuntu 12.04.
So far I've sorted out network connectivity betwee
I think it is not very good choice. You can upgrade your bacula-dir to
5.2.13 from http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ repo.
On 11/25/2013 06:07 PM, Hiren Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a director on centos 5 running version 2.0.3-10.el5.
> I have a number of fd on centos 5 runn
Hi,
I have the same issue. There is no way I think, only custom script can
help. It can be good feature request for bacula developers.
BTW, you must not delete job by id's. It is sufficient to purge volumes.
When purge take place all associated job id's are removed from database
automatically. Th
Looks like a recently discovered bug in FreeBSD:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers/51832
__Martin
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:36:50 -0800, David Newman said:
>
> Apologies for top posting. Kern and Dan asked for more information on
> this issue awhile back, and I'd provid
Hello,
On 25 November 2013 18:07, Hiren Joshi wrote:
>
> I have a director on centos 5 running version 2.0.3-10.el5.
> I have a number of fd on centos 5 running the same version.
>
> I'd like to now back up a centos 6 machine but I can't get 2.X on it only
> version 5.
>
> I'm assuming this isn't
Hello Bacula Enthusiast,
One of my backup client has a lot of files, so we decided a year ago only to
backup this client 2 times a year. With a file/job delete policy of 190 days.
And this turned out to work well.
But there is one issue with housekeeping,
I have a lot of incremental backups wh
Hi,
I have a director on centos 5 running version 2.0.3-10.el5.
I have a number of fd on centos 5 running the same version.
I'd like to now back up a centos 6 machine but I can't get 2.X on it only
version 5.
I'm assuming this isn't compatible, is there any way of making this work and
getting
Hello,
I would like to speak to you about the following points:
1. The rumors of the death of Bacula (the Community version)
2. The Bareos fork of Bacula
3. Bacula Systems and the FSFE (Free Software Foundation Europe)
4. The future of Bacula (the Community version)
1. The rumors of the death o
12 matches
Mail list logo
