On 9 January 2014 12:54, Steven Hammond wrote:
> I missed a couple of days (holidays) backing up from disk to tape (we
> backup disk to disk every night) so when I went to run the job to copy disk
> to tape it only grabbed 100 jobs. This seems sort of artificial (what if I
> had more than 100 wor
Thank you for the response Uwe. It gives me some idea on some items to
look at when scaling the environment.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 03:32:01PM -1000, Romeo Theriault wrote:
>> Hi Uwe, thanks for the response. I'm not sure how many directors
Hello,
The reason this artificial limit is there is that because I saw several
cases of copy/migrate jobs starting on the order of 600 jobs, which
caused the systems in question to totally choke up. It was probably
a combination of insufficient hardware for 600 jobs, and much too
high limits plac
