Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir

2016-09-30 Thread Hankins, Jonathan
So I built the source package on Mint 18 (it's from Debian upstream) and it is still broken. Then, I extracted the original source from the Debian package, and didn't apply the debian patches (except switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch, which I had to do to get it to build). I set prefix to

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir

2016-09-30 Thread Hankins, Jonathan
Jan, I am assuming you're on the latest Mint (18) -- my Mint 18 workstation loaded bacula 7.0.5 when I installed it just now. I am having the same issue with the default config, so let me play with it and see what I can come up with. -Jonathan Hankins On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:29 PM Jan Martin

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir

2016-09-30 Thread Jan Martin
Hi, On my system, you are right. dir runs as bacula:bacula, sd runs as bacula:tape, and fd runs as root:root trinity% bconsole -? Copyright (C) 2000-2014 Free Software Foundation Europe e.V. Version: 7.0.5 (28 July 2014) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 16.04 Usage: bconsole [-s] [-c config_file]

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir

2016-09-30 Thread Hankins, Jonathan
I believe the FD is the inly thing that needs to run as root. I think on Debian/Ubuntu/Mint, the dir runs as bacula:bacula and the SD as bacula:tape, but I may be wrong. Are you sure that your bconsole is 7.0.5 as well? Check everything with: dpkg -l \*bacula\* and: which bconsole ...Just to

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir

2016-09-30 Thread Elias Pereira
I'm not sure, but bacula services must be run as root both user and group. Em 30/09/2016 5:59 PM, "Jan Martin" escreveu: > Hi, > > OK, I just killed the currently running bacula-dir daemon (the nice way, > from the init.d script), and restarted it with the same command line,

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula does not delete OLD files from disk

2016-09-30 Thread Marcin Haba
Hello, Bacula doesn't remove volume files. You mention you expect that Bacula will remove volume files when retention period has expired. The retention period is an option that is part of a big subject called Volume Recycling. Recycling by desing means re-using something again as a something

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir

2016-09-30 Thread Jan Martin
Hi, OK, I just killed the currently running bacula-dir daemon (the nice way, from the init.d script), and restarted it with the same command line, but added -d200. Got some extra stuff at the beginning: trinity% sudo /usr/sbin/bacula-dir -d200 -c /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf -u bacula -g

[Bacula-users] bacula does not delete OLD files from disk

2016-09-30 Thread elm . ceis
I have an issue with bacula version 5.2.6 on Debian. bacula does not delete the physical files from disk after the retention period has expired. I have different paths ( disks) for different bacula jobs. let's say the backup location for client X is under drive 1 and the backup location for

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir

2016-09-30 Thread Elias Pereira
You tried to execute bacula-dir in debug mode? # bacula-dir -d200 Em 30/09/2016 4:49 PM, "Jan Martin" escreveu: > Hello bacula-users! > > I'm having a problem that I can't figure out, so I hope someone here can > help out. > > I have been using bacula 5.2.x for backing up my

[Bacula-users] bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir

2016-09-30 Thread Jan Martin
Hello bacula-users! I'm having a problem that I can't figure out, so I hope someone here can help out. I have been using bacula 5.2.x for backing up my Mint linux box and a couple of Macs. The latest version of Mint goes to bacula v7.0.5, so I installed that after saving my old database and

Re: [Bacula-users] 'Incorrect datetime value' after database update from 12 to 15

2016-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 09/30/2016 10:49 AM, Andreas Nastke wrote: > looks to me as if this toy (mysql) finally handles invalid > timestamps as erroneous. Yes, MySQL now treats 0 timestamps as erroneous, which is rather simple minded, since 0 is a perfectly valid Unix timestamp value. > > > > Daniel Heitepriem

Re: [Bacula-users] 'Incorrect datetime value' after database update from 12 to 15

2016-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
This is due to a change in MySQL.  There are various workarounds, the first one to start with is to get the latest 7.4.4 release. I thought it was fixed in 7.4.2 but maybe it was 7.4.3.  If that does not resolve the problem there are other ways to get

Re: [Bacula-users] 'Incorrect datetime value' after database update from 12 to 15

2016-09-30 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Im not a MySQL crack but "EXPLAIN Job;" results in [...] Field | Type| Null |Key| Default| Extra | SchedTime | datetime| YES | | -00-00 00:00:00 || StartTime | datetime

Re: [Bacula-users] 'Incorrect datetime value' after database update from 12 to 15

2016-09-30 Thread Andreas Nastke
looks to me as if this toy (mysql) finally handles invalid timestamps as erroneous. Daniel Heitepriem schrieb: > Hi guys, > > any thoughts on this ? > > Thanks and regards, > Daniel Heitepriem > > Am 20.09.16 um 12:01 schrieb Daniel Heitepriem: > >Hello everyone, > >I updated my

Re: [Bacula-users] 'Incorrect datetime value' after database update from 12 to 15

2016-09-30 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Hi guys, any thoughts on this ? Thanks and regards, Daniel Heitepriem Am 20.09.16 um 12:01 schrieb Daniel Heitepriem: Hello everyone, I updated my old bacula database from version 12 (Bacula version 5.0.0) to version 15 (Bacula version 7.4.2) which went more or less without