Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning is taking too long; downside of force update status to recycle.

Weird thing is, after the long pruning, I decided to change the volume status to recycle. Done that, the backup worked fine. After that I changed the status of all volumes to recycle. But last night, the scheduled backup didn't run because of pruning vol-F1. I thought when the volume is recycled

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning is taking too long; downside of force update status to recycle.

All of the volumes were full at the time, and have past the retention period. Bacula prunes the oldest volume, and stuck at it. Sorry if this question is trivial, but I don't really understand purging. If I were to purge a volume manually, I will definitely lose all of the backups in the volume.

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning is taking too long; downside of force update status to recycle.

Not that I noticed. Purging will remove the jobs associated with the volume off the catalog right? On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Are you seeing any high loads on the server while pruning job is > running? It looks like the pruning job is

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning is taking too long; downside of force update status to recycle.

Well I've actually update the status of all the volumes to Recycle. Before I did that the status of all volumes were Full. *list media Pool: Default

[Bacula-users] Bacula Wiki is not available since few days

Hello all, It looks like Bacula wiki is not available since few days ... http://wiki.bacula.org Does somebody knows who is managing the server ? Regards Davide -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors