Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2018-01-31 Thread Elias Pereira
> > *FD Connect Timeout = time* > where time is the time that the Director should continue attempting to > contact the File daemon to start a job, and after which the Director will > cancel the job. The default is 30 minutes. > *SD Connect Timeout = time* > where time is the time that the Director

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.6 with Windows client 7.4.4, status error

2018-01-31 Thread Peter Milesson
Thanks Kern. Now I will sleep much better ;-) Peter On 2018-01-31 11:26, Kern Sibbald wrote: The network status command does not exist on older File daemons, which is what the 2 Invalid command means. Yes, you are right.  New features don't work on older software. Best regards, Kern

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2018-01-31 Thread Elias Pereira
Thanks for your answer Kern, I adjusted the parameters and still did not work. Spanning tree settings of the switches where the bacula server and xenserver are connected can affect this way? On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > In general, it is not necessary to set the keep a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bytes/block=64,512 for an LT04

2018-01-31 Thread Ben Laurie
On 31 January 2018 at 10:26, Alan Brown wrote: > On 31/01/18 10:14, Ben Laurie wrote: > > I also have that on my LTO3 drive. > > You should test this using the fill command in btape (which will test > with uncompressible data). if the block size is set correctly you're > going to achieve very clo

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2018-01-31 Thread Kern Sibbald
In general, it is not necessary to set the keep alive time or the heartbeat to 1 minute.  That causes unnecessary network usage.  Setting them to 300 seconds (5 mins) should be sufficient in virtually all cases. On 30.01.2018 21:44, Elias Pereira wro

Re: [Bacula-users] Bytes/block=64,512 for an LT04

2018-01-31 Thread Alan Brown
On 31/01/18 10:14, Ben Laurie wrote: > I also have that on my LTO3 drive. You should test this using the fill command in btape (which will test with uncompressible data). if the block size is set correctly you're going to achieve very close to the published throughput. Please note that 250MB/s fo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.6 with Windows client 7.4.4, status error

2018-01-31 Thread Kern Sibbald
The network status command does not exist on older File daemons, which is what the 2 Invalid command means. Yes, you are right.  New features don't work on older software. Best regards, Kern On 30.01.2018 12:08, Peter Milesson wrote:

[Bacula-users] Notification emails not sent from Bacula 9.0.2

2018-01-31 Thread Christopher Sluman
Since updating from Bacula 7 to 9.0.2 we are not getting emails when an intervention is required, i.e required tape not available in the library. We get all the other notifications when a job finishes. Is this a bug or a mis-configuration? Regards, Chris Sluman ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Bytes/block=64,512 for an LT04

2018-01-31 Thread Ben Laurie
I also have that on my LTO3 drive. On 21 December 2017 at 23:08, Dan Langille wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using Bacula 7.4.7 on FreeBSD 11 > > What Bytes/block are you using for your LTO4 tapes? > > I ask because I just noticed: > > ### > Device tape is "LTO_0" (/dev/nsa0) mounted with: > Volum

Re: [Bacula-users] [Backup Fatal Error ] Deduplication Optimized Volumes testing

2018-01-31 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, As the error message says the Aligned-Disk cannot be opened or does not exist.  What it doesn't say very clearly is that you do not have the aligned-driver.  This driver has not yet been released.  It will be released in binary form in the next couple o

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems getting a tape library to work under FreeBSD

2018-01-31 Thread Cejka Rudolf
Kenneth Garges wrote (2018/01/30): > I???m having trouble getting a tape library to work. Hello, try chio status -v or mtx status. Both should return status of your autochanger including tape labels. If they both do return an error, do you have correct permissons on /dev/ch*? I have the following

Re: [Bacula-users] Bytes/block=64,512 for an LT04

2018-01-31 Thread Cejka Rudolf
Dan Langille wrote (2017/12/21): > Hello, > > I'm using Bacula 7.4.7 on FreeBSD 11 > > What Bytes/block are you using for your LTO4 tapes? Oops, I waited for the others and now I see that I'm waiting too much :o) I still do use Maximum Block Size = 65536 and I never had the problem. The big win