Re: [Bacula-users] Strange error message.

It simply means that you probably had several connections open to the Director OR after the socket to the Director was closed, the program (bconsole?) attempted to send another message. It is probably harmless.   It is also pretty difficult to track down otherwise I would have fixed it.  I thi

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web 8.2.1 released // Bacula 9.4.2

Am 28.01.2019 um 16:57 schrieb Davide Franco: Is it worth for any reason to update the clients with file-daemon version 9.0.6 also? I’d read release notes between 9.0.6 and 9.4.4 and check if they are some improvements which might be useful. Thank you Davide, regarding the "bacula-fd" I fou

Re: [Bacula-users] [External] Re: [Bacula-devel] IBAdmin

On Monday 2019-01-28 19:19:56 Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: > Thank you Kern for your opinion. As I wrote before, IBAdmin should > support databases split without a problem. So I prepared a patch which > support a full databases split. The patch is available in IBAdmin/split > branch for anyone who

Re: [Bacula-users] Lack Persistent Device Naming to use with Alert Command

I tried creating a new rules file based on the existing tape rules but I didn't have any luck making it work and I didn't know how to debug what I'd done. I ended up creating this bash script to create the symlinks and it worked so I think I'll call it good: *#!/bin/bash* *#create persistent dev

[Bacula-users] Strange error message.

What is wrong when you get following error message on a restore operation with BAT: 28-jan 15:02 epo-dir JobId 0: Security Alert: bsock.c:265 Socket has errors=1 on call to client:192.168.1.100:37728 -- Regards, Erik P. Olsen ___ Bacula-users mailin

Re: [Bacula-users] [External] Re: [Bacula-devel] IBAdmin

Hello Kern, pt., 25 sty 2019 o 16:47 Kern Sibbald napisał(a): > Hello guys, > > Interesting conversation. I thought I would throw in some general > comments of my own. > > - I really like seeing another GUI for Bacula, because it is something we > really need. > Thank you Kern, I really apprec

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web 8.2.1 released // Bacula 9.4.2

Just downloaded Bacula from the git server and updated our backup host from Bacula 9.2.2 to Bacula 9.4.2. Is ist worth for any reason to update the clients with file-daemon version 9.0.6 also? -- Ralf Brinkmann ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacul

[Bacula-users] Bacula-Web 8.2.1 released

Hello, I'm pleased to inform you that Bacula-Web 8.2.1 is available now. This version is a minor bug fix release The release notes is available using the link below https://www.bacula-web.org/2019/01/28/bacula-web-8-2-1/

Re: [Bacula-users] Will latest release run on i686

Am 22.01.2019 um 23:12 schrieb Hodges: > All the downloads on the website for 9.2.2 are for AMD64 As I know "AMD64" is a synonym for the 64-bit version of the x86 instruction set - widely used in the linux world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 -- Ralf Brinkmann ___