Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 20:27 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > Write failed at block 8758373. stat=-1 ERR=Auf dem Gerät ist kein > Speicherplatz mehr verfügbar > btape: btape.c:411-0 Volume bytes=565.0 GB. Write rate = 25.08 MB/s > btape: btape.c:612-0 Wrote 1 EOF to "HP Ultrium 4-1" > (/dev/tape/by-id/scsi-HU

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:28:13 +0100, Pierre Bernhardt said: > > Am 10.03.20 um 20:27 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > > Write failed at block 8758373. stat=-1 ERR=Auf dem Gerät ist kein > > Speicherplatz mehr verfügbar > > btape: btape.c:411-0 Volume bytes=565.0 GB. Write rate = 25.08 MB/s > > bt

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Sebastian Suchanek
Am 10.03.2020 um 09:26 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > since beginning of this year a tape issue has been arrived my backups. > All my LTO-4 Tapes will not fill any more to the ~ 760 GiByte than > before. Only ~ 510-580 GiByte will be stored on the tapes which is > shown by the list volume command. L

Re: [Bacula-users] New tape drive

2020-03-13 Thread Steven Hammond
Does anyone have recommendations for MAXIMUM BLOCK SIZE for a LTO-7 tape drive (HP).  We are currently using 2M on the LTO-5 with success (and it seemed to improve the speed).  I didn't know if there was a better setting for the LTO-7 (e.g., 4M) that should be used.  Any suggestions? Steven Ha

Re: [Bacula-users] New tape drive

2020-03-13 Thread Alan Brown
On 13/03/2020 14:51, Steven Hammond wrote: > Does anyone have recommendations for MAXIMUM BLOCK SIZE for a LTO-7 > tape drive (HP).  We are currently using 2M on the LTO-5 with success > (and it seemed to improve the speed).  I didn't know if there was a > better setting for the LTO-7 (e.g., 4M) th

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Alan Brown
On 13/03/2020 12:37, Martin Simmons wrote: >> >> So it looks really there is really an issue on the drive 0 or the connection >> path. >> I will wait for the end of the both tests >> (btape on drive 1 and backup test on drive 0) > You could also try running the HP Library and Tape Tools: > > https

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 13.03.20 um 15:18 schrieb Sebastian Suchanek: > Am 10.03.2020 um 09:26 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > >> since beginning of this year a tape issue has been arrived my backups. >> All my LTO-4 Tapes will not fill any more to the ~ 760 GiByte than >> before. Only ~ 510-580 GiByte will be stored on t

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 13.03.20 um 08:28 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > Am 10.03.20 um 20:27 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: >> Write failed at block 8758373. stat=-1 ERR=Auf dem Gerät ist kein >> Speicherplatz mehr verfügbar >> btape: btape.c:411-0 Volume bytes=565.0 GB. Write rate = 25.08 MB/s >> btape: btape.c:612-0 Wrote