On 7/12/21 12:05 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I can see bacula installation placement is just as hot a topic as it has
> always been. However, I sense a trend toward accepting the /opt/bacula
> concept. I do wish we could convince a distro such as Debian, but they
> have their p
Hello again,
I can see bacula installation placement is just as hot a topic as it has
always been. However, I sense a trend toward accepting the /opt/bacula
concept. I do wish we could convince a distro such as Debian, but they
have their point of view, and I for one do not plan to argue wit
On 7/11/21 5:10 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
On Sunday 2021-07-11 18:31:24 Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello Sven,
Yes, I am aware of the FHS policy, which is perfectly fine for 99.9% of
all installed programs, but not ideal for Bacula.
Hello,
There is nothing special about Bacula in that regard.
I
Hi Marcin,
Thank you very much for your quick reply (as always). I checked httpd logs but
I could not recognize something related to this error. I will have a deeper
look. Your recommendation resolved the issue by the way. It is much appreciated.
Kind regards,
Yakup Kaya
__
Hello Yakup
Something happened with the session file that its content is
unserializeable. Information about this error should be available in
the web server log.
Please move somewhere this file:
/usr/share/baculum/htdocs/protected/Web/Config/session.dump
and it should start working back.
Best
Hello everybody,
Today I started getting an error on Baculum interface. I did not change
anything on the configuration. The details of the OS and bacula/baculum is as
follows. Restarting httpd and bacula services did not change anything.
OS: CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)
Bacula versio
