Original Message
*Subject:* Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or
LTO-5
drives?
*Date:* Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:22:55 +0200
*From:* Andreas Koch
*To:* Thomas
*CC:* bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just bt
On 05/03/12 21:37, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 05/03/12 19:51, Alex Crow wrote:
>
>> Thanks Alan,
>>
>> I am specifically addressing the encryption support within Bacula:
>>
>> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Encryption.html
> Openssl compresses
>>
>> What about when you are encrypting? You have to do the compression in
>> Bacula as once you've encrypted the data it can no longer be compressed
>> by the drive (eg for LTO < LTO4 where the drive cannot encrypt.)
>
> Encryption programs generally compress as well in order to increase
> entr
>> If it is supported in any way, I'd be happy to know. If not, what would
>> be the best way about getting it implemented?
> I'd want to be pretty sure its going to help before doing this. On my
> (somewhat aged) development machine, OpenSSL can do AES-128 CBC at 55
> MB/s (bytes, not bits), so i
Hi,
We have set up a backup server that uses encryption in the File Daemon.
However we find it is really slow, in fact we are only getting about
80Mbps (megabits, not -bytes) throughput while running 4 backup threads.
This is backing up from an NFS-connected disk backup host that can
easily sa
