[Bacula-users] Bacula offsite backups (once again)

2011-04-11 Thread Bart Swedrowski
I have successfully been using Bacula for almost 2 years now. Fairly small (~30 machines) and straight forward setup -- only one director, one SD. A need has arisen to start doing offsite backups. Now, what seems like pretty trivial task, came out to be major headache. I went through mailing li

Re: [Bacula-users] Help on restore

2011-02-01 Thread Bart Swedrowski
Valerio Pachera wrote: > I wonder wy, on bat (the qt gui), it doen't show files directly under > the backued up folder but only files in into subdirectories. > Did you experienced the same problem? Sorry - I'm exclusively bconsole user (command line). -

Re: [Bacula-users] Help on restore

2011-02-01 Thread Bart Swedrowski
Valerio Pachera wrote: > As you can see, there is only one file. A different version of this > file has to exist for each bacup. > > But by bacula console I can only mark the latest version. > Do you know ho I can select prevous versions? Restore job allows you to select a date range from where yo

Re: [Bacula-users] Help on restore

2011-02-01 Thread Bart Swedrowski
Valerio Pachera wrote: > I see only one and I don't even know which date correspond. Also you may find "dir" command quite useful. It took me a while before I found out it being equivalent of "ls -al"... -- Special Offe

Re: [Bacula-users] Only one Pool open on given device at the same time

2011-01-30 Thread Bart Swedrowski
Oh I guess I can answer this one myself already. Creating dedicated Storages for Pools should just do the trick. If anyone knows better solution please do speak. On 30 January 2011 19:18, Bart Swedrowski wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have got a Bacula configured and running for quit

[Bacula-users] Only one Pool open on given device at the same time

2011-01-30 Thread Bart Swedrowski
Hello everyone, I have got a Bacula configured and running for quite a while now, without any major issues. However, as I keep on adding client nodes, more and more often I am running into situation when some jobs are waiting for the other ones to finish. The configuration I use is as follows: -

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd 2.4.4 on ubuntu 10.04.1

2011-01-19 Thread Bart Swedrowski
2011/1/19 Bartosz.C > I have bacula-director on debian lenny - version 2.4.4 > I have few serwers on ubuntu 10.04.1, and default (apt-get) bacula is > 5.0.1, so I would like to install 2.4.4 on them. Does anyone did it? > And how to do it? You will have to build Debian packages for Ubuntu 10.04

Re: [Bacula-users] Choice of DB for catalog

2011-01-18 Thread Bart Swedrowski
On 18 January 2011 09:18, Arunav Mandal wrote: > Our catalog is around 16GB and at times I have seen mysql been slow. I am > using Mysql 5.0.77. Is there any easy way to migrate from Mysql to Postgres > With this kind of problems and when catalog is getting that big it's not a matter of choosing

Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backups too large

2011-01-15 Thread Bart Swedrowski
On 15 January 2011 14:12, Eric Bollengier wrote: > It sounds to be a bug when the FileDaemon is computing the checksum of the > file, it updates the Bytes Written counter when it shouldn't. > > Looks trivial to fix, but I need some time to test the patch That's interesting. Would you like me t

Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backups too large

2011-01-14 Thread Bart Swedrowski
On 14 January 2011 20:18, Martin Simmons wrote: > It sounds like you have some large files which compress a lot. > Nah, I don't think that is the case. I know what are those files and those are mainly small, tiny files like emails, small log files. Have a look at below's output. *14-Jan 02:38

Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backups too large

2011-01-14 Thread Bart Swedrowski
On 14 January 2011 09:23, Bart Swedrowski wrote: > Also, it's Bacula 5.0.3-2 re-compiled from sources provided on www.bacula.org. Sorry - that is Bacula 5.0.3-1 re-compiled from sources on www.bacula.org. --

Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backups too large

2011-01-14 Thread Bart Swedrowski
2011/1/13 Mark : > Have you done a 'list files jobid=' for one of your incrementals? >  Maybe you have a few really large files that are getting changed every day, > and therefore getting backed up each day. Yeah, I tried that, too. It's only listing files that got changed/are new and should be b

Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backups too large

2011-01-13 Thread Bart Swedrowski
2011/1/12 Kleber Leal > Yes. The entire file is backed up again when gets modification. > Incremental backups include all modified files since last backup (Full, > Incremental ou differential). Incremental and differential are file based. > if you have a 100GB file and this was modified, it will