[Bacula-users] will delete volume delete associated jobs?

2013-09-11 Thread Mapper ict department
Hello, I have the following question: will delete volume delete associated jobs? I ask this because off how the following message is constructed (especially what i have put between arrows). This command will delete volume XO7561L3 and all Jobs saved - on that volume - from the Catalog The

Re: [Bacula-users] level: Since?

2009-08-25 Thread Mapper ict department
: this level is not supported. It would be nice though if it were possible. Does somebody has this working already? With kind regards, Tony Mapper ict department i...@mapperlithography.com 20-8-2009 19:12 Hello, Can anyone tell me what the Since level is for? I get there by: - typing run

[Bacula-users] level: Since?

2009-08-20 Thread Mapper ict department
Hello, Can anyone tell me what the Since level is for? I get there by: - typing run - choosing a job - typing mod - selecting 1: level With kind regards, Tony -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-08-04 Thread Mapper ict department
Well... the problem is discovered... I don't even dare to say what it was... :( With kind regards, Tony -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-08-03 Thread Mapper ict department
Hello John, I'm testing with tar on a new tape now. Should be a sufficient test since the problems occurs on all newly added tapes. I'm testing it on a different tapedrive now since the the full backup from the weekend is still running on the tapedrive in question. I will run it on the drive

[Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-30 Thread ict Mapper ict department
Bacula version: (26 July 2008) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu debian 4.0 backup unit/changer: HP storageworks MSL2024 LTO3 Hello, We have a real weird problem. Tapes are not fully written. But this is not in all cases. The problem seems to concentrate around our monthly backups. When the tapes are

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-22 Thread Mapper ict department
Correction. The same occurs also during weekly backup now. Also with tapes labeled which were put directly into the weekly pool. We haven't noticed that before since only additional month tapes are normally added since we've already had labelled all weekly tapes we needed and have been recycling

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-21 Thread Mapper ict department
I went through all the logs and found no errors involving scsi except for this. I only found this once so i guess it's not not a biggy. Jun 19 14:16:05 fileserver kernel: scsi 0:0:3:0: rejecting I/O to dead device Jun 19 14:16:05 fileserver kernel: scsi 0:0:3:0: rejecting I/O to dead device

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-20 Thread ict Mapper ict department
Thank you for your response John, Here is the contents of the config files: [bacula-dir.conf] # # Default Bacula Director Configuration file # # The only thing that MUST be changed is to add one or more # file or directory names in the Include directive of the # FileSet resource. # # For

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-20 Thread ict Mapper ict department
Sorry, i forgot that one. Here is the list media from the monthly pool: As you can see in the beginning it worked better then now. | MediaId|VolumeName|VolStatus|Enabled|VolBytes | VolFiles|VolRetention| Recycle| Slot |InChanger| MediaType| LastWritten |

[Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-19 Thread ict Mapper ict department
Bacula version: (26 July 2008) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu debian 4.0 backup unit/changer: HP storageworks MSL2024 LTO3 Hello, We have a real weird problem. Tapes are not fully written. But this is not in all cases. The problem seems to concentrate around our monthly backups. When the tapes are