Re: [Bacula-users] How to avoid "The sizes do not match!"?

2009-10-15 Thread Marek.M.Stopka
You could configure your Bacula to use new volume for every job, this could solve your problem. -Original Message- From: epiuse [mailto:bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 10:45 AM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Bacula-users] How to avoid "

Re: [Bacula-users] Copying backup "On the fly"

2009-10-15 Thread Marek.M.Stopka
Yeah it will, but when new full backup is taken, you again copy entire operating system copy over network, even though you have already a few copy of that operating systém on a target server. So, yeah it will low the traffic, but not that much as a smarter solution could. :-) Every time you tak

Re: [Bacula-users] Copying backup "On the fly"

2009-10-15 Thread Marek.M.Stopka
This is not a solution at all, because Bacula every time you create new backup will create new virtual tapes, and since rsync "deduplicate" only files, not entire amount of data that is going to be transfared, this do not solve anything for us. Acctually I am not even sure if we would use LVM on

Re: [Bacula-users] Copying backup "On the fly"

2009-10-15 Thread Marek.M.Stopka
Hi. I am actually thinking about same thing at this time, and well... deduplicated replication over network under linux seems to be a little bit complicated task... But I have an idea that could solve this issue, however, I don't have it implemented yet... but the idea is to use DRBD and lessfs