Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar

2016-03-11 Thread Simon Templar
In my case using spooling didn’t prevent shoe-shining; it just introduced long pauses while data was spooled. I think all this means is that I can read from my data sources faster than my tape can write. So far the only change I made to help with shoe-shining was to set Max File Size to a

Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar

2016-03-10 Thread Simon Templar
Dan, I’m new to bacula, and arguably not very smart, but I’ve been struggling with tape drive performance pretty much since the moment I got the configurations to a functional state so I’ll share my learnings thus far. Can you hear your tape drive? If so, do you hear lots of stops and starts

Re: [Bacula-users] Trouble setting up Bacula on FreeBSD

2016-03-04 Thread Simon Templar
Spool Directory = /usr/local/bacula/spool # If you have smartctl, enable this, it has more info than tapeinfo # Alert Command = "sh -c 'smartctl -H -l error %c'" } Messages { Name = Standard director = Director-Ural = all } > On Mar 1, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Cejka Rudolf <c

Re: [Bacula-users] Trouble setting up Bacula on FreeBSD

2016-03-01 Thread Simon Templar
written to the spool directory (which is ssd) so maybe the real backups will be faster. We’ll see. Thanks again, Simon > On Mar 1, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Martin Simmons <mar...@lispworks.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:07:55 +0100, Cejka Rudolf said: >>

[Bacula-users] Trouble setting up Bacula on FreeBSD

2016-02-29 Thread Simon Templar
Or perhaps a more accurate subject would be "Trouble successfully using Bacula on FreeBSD"... I've set up bacula 7.2 on my FreeBSD server using Postgres as the backend database. My tape drive info: mt -f /dev/nsa0 status Drive: sa0: Serial Number: ##