the
director is running. Does anybody knows what this could be?
Thanks
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org
---
Unix guy, Mac head, Rails wannabe,
iPhone Dev-ious, Computer Science
alumnus, usability guesspert and
overall big time visionary
..
François
-Message d'origine-
De : Stefan Sorin Nicolin [mailto:bac...@nicolinux.org]
Envoyé : lundi 30 mars 2009 13:14
À : Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : [Bacula-users] Broken Pipe messages
Hi,
I am getting more and more messages like this although the Bacula jobs
do
Concurrent Jobs = 20
}
I am using spooling to enable concurrent backup jobs (but having the
directive Maximum Volume Jobs = 1 in the pools config). Could this
somehow produce corrupt volumes?
Thank you.
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org
---
Unix guy, Mac head, Rails wannabe,
iPhone Dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
regards,
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org/timr
---
Unix guy, Mac head, Rails wannabe,
iPhone Dev-ious, Computer Science
alumnus, usability guesspert
On 09.03.2009, at 13:55, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:41:06 +0100, Stefan Sorin Nicolin said:
If you include exclude = yes in your Exclude {} block then all
Files
and/or directories selected would be excluded. If you leave out the
exclude=yes statement then everything
(have to kill it since it
doesen't respond to my civillized requests) the backups continue.
Did anyone encounter such a problem? Could it be because of the old
client version? With 40+ clients I am hesitant to update all at once.
Thanks much.
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org/timr
---
Unix
-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org
---
Unix guy, Mac head, Rails wannabe,
iPhone Dev-ious, Computer Science
alumnus, usability guesspert and
overall big time visionary
Stefan
On 13.01.2009, at 13:48, John Drescher wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Stefan Sorin Nicolin
r...@nicolinux.org wrote:
Thank you for your responses.
Somehow I get the feeling that excluding a single file's contents
is way
easier than risking a failed restore. Since I don't mind
syslog-ng
then delete /dev/tty12
jmd0 john # rm /dev/tty12
Then create /dev/tty12 again
jmd0 john # mknod /dev/tty12 c 4 12
Then restart syslog-ng
jmd0 john # /etc/init.d/syslog-ng restart
syslog-ng |* Starting syslog-ng...
John
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org
a system from backup.
The only way I can imagine it right now is to exclude the file
completely and create a dedicated restore jobdef where /dev/tty12 is
created per runscript directive. This doesen't feel right though.
Any ideas?
Thanks much.
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org
---
Unix
with restoring old files...
Thanks much.
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org
---
Unix guy, Mac head, Rails wannabe,
Computer Science alumnus, usability
guesspert and overall big time visionary
--
SF.Net email
directives
(that I didn't change) and I wonder why the heck the defaults do not
kick in when the time exceeds?
My bacula setup feels brittle - I don't trust it anymore :(
I'd be very grateful for any help.
Thanks
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org
---
Unix guy, Mac head, Rails wannabe
12 matches
Mail list logo