Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status report - 30 August 2022

2022-09-02 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello Eric, Great job! wt., 30 sie 2022 o 09:30 Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel < bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> napisał(a): > > 2. Bacula Binaries > 3. Windows Binaries > 4. macOS Binaries > > Just a sake of curiosity, in terms of Bacula Community migration to GitLab - do you plan to intr

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report -- 9 June 2018

2018-06-12 Thread Davide Franco
Hello Wanderlei, There's nothing to worry about the Debian repository you've mentioned If you you compare with a "standard" Debian repo, the major difference is that Bacula version and your personal "key" has been added to the url. Nothing much more. Debian Stretch repository http://ftp.ch.debia

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report -- 9 June 2018

2018-06-10 Thread Wanderlei Huttel
Hello Kern Can you take a look in the debian repo. It looks that the debian directory are "duplicated" (too many folders comparing with centos repository) Debian: http://bacula.org/packages/X/debs/9.0.8/stretch/amd64/dists/stretch/main/binary-amd64/ CentOS http://bacula.org/packages/

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report

2014-11-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2014 06:41 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Fri, Sep 05

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report

2014-11-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 10/29/2014 02:02 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, >>> Hello, >>> I have posted a Bacula S

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report

2014-10-29 Thread Dan Langille
On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, >>> Hello, >>> I have posted

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report

2014-10-29 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >Hello, > > > >>I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site. > >>It discuss

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report

2014-10-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> Hello, >> > Hello, > >> I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site. >> It discusses the following items: >> >> 1. Bacula Release Status >> >> 2. Windows Binar

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report

2014-10-13 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > Hello, > I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site. > It discusses the following items: > > 1. Bacula Release Status > > 2. Windows Binaries > Hmm.. so there are no "community" windows binaries any

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status report

2010-07-27 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 12:21:01 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > 2. New release cycle: > > The little code we currently have for the next major release is in the SF > > bacula git repository under Branch-5.1. > > > > We are considering to m

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status report

2010-07-27 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > 2. New release cycle: > The little code we currently have for the next major release is in the SF > bacula git repository under Branch-5.1. > > We are considering to moving to a regular 6 month release cycle. The > advantage > o

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status report

2007-08-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
Thanks -- your testing is much appreciated. Regards, Kern > Kern Sibbald wrote: > >> I would appreciate if beta testers would retest the current SVN. >> Thanks. > > Other than weird-files2 (known glitch due to cp deficiency) it passes > everything fine on Mac OS 10.4. Also passes everything on