On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 08:23 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >
> The told me to upload it to the shell area then to ftp it from there. I
> consider that a total waste of time for the docs, but I'll let you decide if
> you want to use it for the srpms.
>
> I've given you access to the shell area,
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:56 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> > >
> > > > But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the
> >
Scott Barninger wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:56 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote:
>>
>>
>> What about two tarballs? PDF. HTML.
>>
>>
> Well, yes, I suppose I could build my own but I was sort of looking to
> avoid that.
>
>
Depending on the platf
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:56 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> > >
> > > > But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the
> >
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
>
> > But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the packages. So
> > I'm thinking about changing that and making only the pdf manuals (user
> > and developer) actual sources in the
On Sunday 17 June 2007 23:47, Scott Barninger wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:56 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Sunday 17 June 2007 19:09, Scott Barninger wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:56 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Sunday 17 June 2007 18:56, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> > >
> > > > But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the
> > > > p
On Sunday 17 June 2007 18:42, Scott Barninger wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> >
> > > But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the packages. So
> > > I'm thinking about changing that and making only
On Sunday 17 June 2007 18:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> Good Afternoon,
>
> As I sat here earlier watching the 39 MB SRPM (30 MB of which is the
> docs tarball) for 2.1.18 crawl it's way up to sourceforge I began to
> wonder if it is not time for a change. The documentation package has
> grown subs
On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> >
> > > But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the
> > > packages. So I'm thinking about changing that and making only the
On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote:
> But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the packages. So
> I'm thinking about changing that and making only the pdf manuals (user
> and developer) actual sources in the RPM package.
I see no reason for the source files to be in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
