Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] mysql version

2011-02-13 Thread rst
Thank you for your prompt reply. I'll try to answer both Kern and Randy in this message. To Kern: I thought bacula is developed for some specific version of mysql and changing it could be very risky. To Randy: There are the following two types of incompatible changes:

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] mysql version

2011-02-13 Thread Randy Katz
On 2/13/2011 3:00 AM, rst wrote: Thank you for your prompt reply. I'll try to answer both Kern and Randy in this message. To Kern: I thought bacula is developed for some specific version of mysql and changing it could be very risky. To Randy: There are the following

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] mysql version

2011-02-13 Thread Frank Sweetser
On 2/13/2011 6:00 AM, rst wrote: Thank you for your prompt reply. I'll try to answer both Kern and Randy in this message. One more point I wanted to throw out there - while Kern and the rest of the Bacula developers do an excellent job of making sure Bacula works on a wide range of

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] mysql version

2011-02-13 Thread rst
One more point I wanted to throw out there - while Kern and the rest of the Bacula developers do an excellent job of making sure Bacula works on a wide range of configurations, you don't have to take their word for it. Instead, you can set up and run the regression suite:

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] mysql version

2011-02-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 13 February 2011 13.48:34 Frank Sweetser wrote: On 2/13/2011 6:00 AM, rst wrote: Thank you for your prompt reply. I'll try to answer both Kern and Randy in this message. One more point I wanted to throw out there - while Kern and the rest of the Bacula developers do an

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] mysql version

2011-02-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 13 February 2011 12.00:37 rst wrote: Thank you for your prompt reply. I'll try to answer both Kern and Randy in this message. To Kern: I thought bacula is developed for some specific version of mysql and changing it could be very risky. That was the case 10 years

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] mysql version

2011-02-13 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/13/11 09:37, Kern Sibbald wrote: That was the case 10 years ago, but since 5-6 years, both MySQL and PostgreSQL have been very stable for the features Bacula uses. We seldom find problems. What you are speaking about below (version 4.1.22...) for us are rather old versions -- I

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] mysql version

2011-02-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 12 February 2011 14.41:40 rst wrote: Hello all, Is it possible to know the exact version of mysql that was used for testing bacula 5.0.3? I'm asking this question because some patches of mysql introduce incompatible changes. Aside from binaries which require the version on the