Brian A. Seklecki schrieb:
> Does anyone know why Fedora 8 YUM repo is stuck back on Bacula 2.0.3? I
> thought we were supposed to be beta-testing new development branch code
> for Redhat clients :)
AFAIK the only reason is that Andreas Thienemann is too busy currently to
update
Bacula to 2.2
Thank you very much Felix.
The FC7 AMD64 binaries run just fine on FC8 after --nodeps. Almost
nothing changed between FC7 and FC8 anyway.
The problem now is that we have no YUM repo for your binaries to manage
release engineering.
Does anyone know why Fedora 8 YUM repo is stuck back on Bacula 2.
