Re: [Bacula-users] Job vs volume retention periods

2009-06-24 Thread Dirk Bartley
> > Thanks for the help provided so far, it's very much appreciated. I do have > a few follow-up questions: > > > In a case where the client's storage pool Pools don't belong to a client unless you set up the directors schedules that way and don't run any manually to the pool. > would of

[Bacula-users] Job vs volume retention periods

2009-06-24 Thread phatrik
an > > > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: phatrik [mailto:bacula-forum < at > backupcentral.com] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2009 03:46 > > An: bacula-users < at > lists.sourceforge.net > > Betreff: [Bacula-users] Job v

Re: [Bacula-users] Job vs volume retention periods

2009-06-24 Thread Dirk Bartley
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: phatrik [mailto:bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2009 03:46 > An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: [Bacula-users] Job vs volume retention periods > > > Hi, > > I'm confuse

Re: [Bacula-users] Job vs volume retention periods

2009-06-24 Thread Fahrer, Julian
liche Nachricht- Von: phatrik [mailto:bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2009 03:46 An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: [Bacula-users] Job vs volume retention periods Hi, I'm confused in regards to job retention vs volume retention. From the lit

[Bacula-users] Job vs volume retention periods

2009-06-23 Thread phatrik
Hi, I'm confused in regards to job retention vs volume retention. From the little bit I understand, if the volume retention period is passed and bacula is unable to find any other appendable volumes in the client's stoarge pool, it will delete all file and job records and then re-use that vol