-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Binkley wrote:
> Do you think upgrading the director is a better solution over the long-term
> since the 3.0 director can talk to 2.4 clients?
That's definitely the solution I would vote for. There are scripts and
documentation available for movi
> Sorry, Director is running 2.4.4 on CentOS 5.3. Storage Daemon is running
> 3.0.2 on a different CentOS 5.3 machine. Director and Storage are fine
> together, but the 2.4.4 director cannot access the 3.0.2 fd (running on the
> sd machine). This is all with sqlite.
>
I can not help with CentOS but
Hi,
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Paul Binkley wrote:
> I hope someone can help. I have been using Bacula for a couple of months now
> running 2.4 on the director and all client daemons, and 3.0 for the storage
> daemon (my mistake). This has been working fine. The 3.0 file daemon isn't
> compatible with
.
***
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 10:03 AM
To: Paul Binkley
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Possible to downgrade sd/fd from 3.0 to 2.4?
On Mon
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Paul Binkley wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I hope someone can help. I have been using Bacula for a couple of months now
> running 2.4 on the director and all client daemons, and 3.0 for the storage
> daemon (my mistake). This has been working fine. The 3.0 file daemon isn
Hi Folks,
I hope someone can help. I have been using Bacula for a couple of months now
running 2.4 on the director and all client daemons, and 3.0 for the storage
daemon (my mistake). This has been working fine. The 3.0 file daemon isn't
compatible with the 2.4 director, so I need to downgrade.
I
