Re: [Bacula-users] 2.4.2 vs 2.5.16 on CentOS

Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I'm setting up a new bacula installation on CentOS 5.2. > I planned on using the FSchwarz EL5 rpms because the install very well > under CentOS 5.2 > Now I am wondering whether it's worth the hassle to compile 2.5.16 from > source. > Unforunately I am no

[Bacula-users] 2.4.2 vs 2.5.16 on CentOS

Hi everyone! I'm setting up a new bacula installation on CentOS 5.2. I planned on using the FSchwarz EL5 rpms because the install very well under CentOS 5.2 Now I am wondering whether it's worth the hassle to compile 2.5.16 from source. Unforunately I am not a programmer so the changelog of 2.5.16