Am 01.04.2013 18:07, schrieb Phil Stracchino:
> On 04/01/13 11:25, dweimer wrote:
>> Runs fairly well, but VSS seems to fail causing the backup to fail
>> every three to four days.
>
> Ah, so that really hasn't improved since I was using Bacula on Windows
> 2000 then. The same thing happed there
Hello,
2013/4/1 Phil Stracchino
> So, after a mostly-unsuccessful[1] experiment with Acronis TrueImage,
> I've decided to revisit backing up the four Windows 7/64 machines on my
> network using Bacula. However, I understand there is significant
> complexity in correctly handling mount points in
On 04/01/13 11:25, dweimer wrote:
> Runs fairly well, but VSS seems to fail causing the backup to fail
> every three to four days.
Ah, so that really hasn't improved since I was using Bacula on Windows
2000 then. The same thing happed there; VSS would occasionally just Not
Work. (And to make it
On 04/01/2013 9:53 am, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> So, after a mostly-unsuccessful[1] experiment with Acronis TrueImage,
> I've decided to revisit backing up the four Windows 7/64 machines on
> my
> network using Bacula. However, I understand there is significant
> complexity in correctly handling m
So, after a mostly-unsuccessful[1] experiment with Acronis TrueImage,
I've decided to revisit backing up the four Windows 7/64 machines on my
network using Bacula. However, I understand there is significant
complexity in correctly handling mount points in the Windows Vista/7
family. Also, since t