Hello all --
I want to configure a simple Backup Job Resource which does not include
Storage Directive. In fact, I have three Pools (each Pool contains its own
Storage Directive instance). The Pools are indirectly referred to the Backup
Job Resource via the Schedule Resource that the Job refers to (e.g., with
Pool= overrides in the Schedule Resource). Is it therefore logically correct
for me to not include a Storage Directive in the Backup Job Resource
definition (especially considering that I have multiple Storage Resources
which are referred to by Pools which Pools are referred to by the Schedule
Resource's Job overrides)?
I hope I posed this question correctly and not too ambiguously -- Bacula is
a very powerful and at times abstract system and I've learned by studying it
that there is quite a bit of referential indirection possible among the
various Resource data structures.
Much thanks!
-H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
