Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You are not using the same lines that I tell you. AND ALWAYS COPY THE MAILING LIST, unless as some members would say, you want to pay me in support fees. I don't know what the problem is, but you are not using the same lines I give you. What I said to

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Cristobal Sabroe Yde
I have not followed all the thread, so I'm sorry if I'm talking about something else. I have seen that in the "bacula" init script built by the installation process this variables defined: BACFDCFG=/bacula/scripts BACSDCFG=/bacula/scripts BACDIRCFG=/bacula/scripts and then the s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 "dot-space" is correct -- you should not change that. I'm asking what you get if you do that from the command line. That should source the functions file and provide 'daemon' as well as other things. Beren wrote: > Yep, the bacula-dir startup script d

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Beren
Yep, the bacula-dir startup script definitely has a "dot-space" before /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions. I removed the ". " from the bacula-dir startup script in /etc/init.d and /etc/rc.d/init.d and it still can't find the daemon function... On 15/02/07, Beren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correction.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Beren
Correction... it does exist in rc.d/init.d On 15/02/07, Beren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right! Now we're getting somewhere: > > From bacula-dir.conf: > # Source function library > . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions > > however, "functions" is located in /etc/init.d > > I tried: > > . ./etc/init.d/fun

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You wrote: . ./etc/init.d/functions Did you mean . /etc/init.d/functions (. is a command that loads files into the environment) or did you actually do the above ('cuz that won't work)? Beren wrote: > Right! Now we're getting somewhere: > >>From bac

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Beren
Right! Now we're getting somewhere: >From bacula-dir.conf: # Source function library . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions however, "functions" is located in /etc/init.d I tried: . ./etc/init.d/functions and /etc/init.d/functions both still didn't work. Says it can't find the daemon command. On 1

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That should be right. I don't have any EL3 machines (AS is just a version of RHEL, like WS and ES). The command 'daemon' probably DOES exist on your system though... in fact, look at the top of the bacula-dir script; you probably have this: # Source

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-15 Thread Beren
I used bacula-mysql-2.0.2-1.el3.i386.rpm - It says "Enterprise Linux" but in the past that has worked with Redhat AS. Maybe I should just build it from source...? On 14/02/07, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Which rpm did you use,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-14 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Which rpm did you use, though? If 'daemon' is not a command that exists in RHEL3, the script should probably not try to use it. =R Beren wrote: > Hi... I copied to the list this time... sorry about the last two times :) > > I'm using RedHat Advanced

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-14 Thread Beren
Hi... I copied to the list this time... sorry about the last two times :) I'm using RedHat Advanced Server v3. I think i've got the right RPM.. It installed fine anyway. I've changed permissions of the bacula directory and its contained files to owner "bacula" and group "bacula" /etc/init.d/bacu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-13 Thread Miki Lewinger
Howdy, Please check the permissions of the directories involved are set to user and group bacula (check the compilation config file for the /working, /bin, etc, paths). If they are not and you try chown it into bacula, and it fails, it means your passwd file (or whatever authentication scheme

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-13 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Again, please copy the list. :) I suspect you are not using the bacula that is specifically for your distrobution of Linux. I believe daemon is an RHEL thing. You have not mentioned your distro, but this is probably the problem. I'd make sure there's

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-13 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If you are using a shell that supports it, add a 'set -x' or equivalent near the top of the script and you'll see the execution of every command and might see what goes wrong. Beren wrote: > Hi Everyone > > I've just upgraded from 1.38 to v2.0.1 and

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.1 Startup script not working, manual start works fine.

2007-02-13 Thread Beren
Hi Everyone I've just upgraded from 1.38 to v2.0.1 and changed my bacula-dir.conf to accomodate. I can't start the director bacula by typing /etc/bacula/bacula start or by typing /etc/init.d/bacula-dir start or service bacula start It says it completes successfully, but if I do "ps -ef" I can't