Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-23 Thread Martin Simmons
gh, so it can trigger shoe-shining more easily that backup. __Martin > -John > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:51 PM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bac

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-22 Thread May, John
s [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:26 PM > > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow > > >>>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:50:41 -0600, May, Joh

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-22 Thread Martin Simmons
ob. But isn't that obvious? Maybe I misunderstood your question. __Martin > -John > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:50 AM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-22 Thread May, John
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow >>>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:59:34 -0600, May, John said: > > As far as I know it was running at about 70MB/s. It could have been > shoe-shining a bit though, not really sure. 600GB a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-22 Thread Martin Simmons
ed rate. Shoe-shining sounds like a real possibility. > -John > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:26 PM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 res

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-21 Thread May, John
: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow >>>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:50:41 -0600, May, John said: > > Monday morning, 3 days later and it is still restoring. It's finished about > 600GB, which is less than half of what is on the two tapes. I'm p

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-21 Thread Martin Simmons
t; John > > -Original Message- > From: May, John [mailto:john@fugrohorizons.com] > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 7:52 AM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow > > >Hi John... Is it pos

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-19 Thread May, John
nt: Friday, July 16, 2010 7:52 AM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow >Hi John... Is it possible that the backup job you are trying to restore from >was running at the same time as other backup jobs were runnin

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-16 Thread May, John
Original Message- From: Bill Arlofski [mailto:waa-bac...@revpol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:06 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow On 07/15/10 14:07, May, John wrote: > I am using Bacula 5.0.2 using MySQ

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-15 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 07/15/10 14:07, May, John wrote: > I am using Bacula 5.0.2 using MySQL on Centos 5.4 x64. I'm trying to > restore some files from a backup I made a couple months ago. I the restore > is about 1.5 TB in size and spans two LTO4 tapes. I can start the restore > just fine and the first 5GB fl

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-15 Thread May, John
age- From: Dan Langille [mailto:d...@langille.org] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:17 PM To: May, John Cc: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow On 7/15/2010 3:05 PM, May, John wrote: >> Are you restoring

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-15 Thread Dan Langille
On 7/15/2010 3:05 PM, May, John wrote: >> Are you restoring a few files from a backup? An entire backup? > > I am restoring the entire backup, the full two tapes worth of data. If you were selecting a few files, here and there, I would look at your skip forward feature on your tape drive and ens

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-15 Thread May, John
m: Dan Langille [mailto:d...@langille.org] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 1:06 PM To: May, John Cc: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow On 7/15/2010 2:07 PM, May, John wrote: > I am using Bacula 5.0.2 using MySQ

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-15 Thread Dan Langille
On 7/15/2010 2:07 PM, May, John wrote: > I am using Bacula 5.0.2 using MySQL on Centos 5.4 x64. I’m trying to > restore some files from a backup I made a couple months ago. I the > restore is about 1.5 TB in size and spans two LTO4 tapes. I can start > the restore just fine and the first 5GB flies

[Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow

2010-07-15 Thread May, John
I am using Bacula 5.0.2 using MySQL on Centos 5.4 x64. I'm trying to restore some files from a backup I made a couple months ago. I the restore is about 1.5 TB in size and spans two LTO4 tapes. I can start the restore just fine and the first 5GB flies by in a minute or so, then the restore s