Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 tape pool definition reports incorrectly

2017-09-11 Thread Martin Simmons
BAT seems not to use the Maximum Volume Bytes when it calculates the % used (it uses the average amount used per tape for each MediaType according to the source code). "Better" is subjective, but I think Maximum Volume Bytes is meaningless if you use hardware compression on the tapes (unless you

[Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 tape pool definition reports incorrectly

2017-09-08 Thread Hicks, Daniel CTR OSD DMEA
Hello, I am using Bacula 9.0.3 on Centos7 and have the following issue when reviewing storage from bat. I am using LTO-5 tapes that are 1.5TB raw and 3TB compressed. I believe that I have set the Bacula-dir.conf tape pool definition correctly but when I look at bat after a single job wrote to