ahrer, Julian
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
Julian,
Sadly, I have been bitten by the static/dynamically linked technicality. What I
want to do is compile bacula-fd on a test machine and copy the binary over to
the production machine and run it. Problem is, the fd com
No problem
Von: mehma sarja [mailto:mehmasa...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. März 2009 01:34
An: Fahrer, Julian
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
Got it compiled ... THANKS!
Yudhvir
===
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Fahrer, Julian wrote:
I usually
me (maybe
> on the weekend).
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Julian
>
>
>
> *Von:* mehma sarja [mailto:mehmasa...@gmail.com]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 3. März 2009 00:56
> *An:* Fahrer, Julian
> *Betreff:* Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
&
ahrer, Julian
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
I am looking for a bacula-fd binary for a sparc Solaris 10. If you have a
compiled version, and don't mind parting with a copy...
Yudhvir
===
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Fahrer, Julian wrote:
Hi,
I am running bacu
Brian Debelius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have watched a few threads go by about compiling Bacula on Solaris,
> and I have not come to the conclusion as to whether anyone has gotten it
> to run and be stable. So..
> Does Bacula compile? Does Bacula run reliably once compiled?
Yes, I'm using bacula on S
Are you speaking of Solaris binaries or Linux binaries? I have not seen
any Solaris packages. I saw Bacula v2.2.8 on Blastwave a few minutes ago.
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Do you have some reason you need to compile it as opposed to using
> b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blastwave is what I was referring to. I'm a little surprised they
haven't gone past 2.2.8, but that's the latest I feel like running
anyway (2.4.x seemed to be a little problematic for awhile there and
things are running fine as-is).
=R
Brian Debeliu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you have some reason you need to compile it as opposed to using
binary packages that are provided? I switched from the former to the
latter (albeit on Solaris 9 for my director/storage daemon), but because
it was easier, not because it didn't work (
2009 17:27
An: bacula-users
Betreff: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
Hi,
I have watched a few threads go by about compiling Bacula on Solaris,
and I have not come to the conclusion as to whether anyone has gotten it
to run and be stable. So..
Does Bacula compile? Does Bacula run rel
Hi,
I have watched a few threads go by about compiling Bacula on Solaris,
and I have not come to the conclusion as to whether anyone has gotten it
to run and be stable. So..
Does Bacula compile? Does Bacula run reliably once compiled?
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
