Weber, Philip wrote:
> I've fairly recently implemented Bacula on Solaris 9 servers - Director,
> 2 Storage Daemons, 2 tape libraries, MySQL. I also have a similar test
> environment which I can get up and running fairly quickly.
>
> Should I be running the regression tests either for my own upgr
Weber, Philip wrote:
> I've fairly recently implemented Bacula on Solaris 9 servers - Director,
> 2 Storage Daemons, 2 tape libraries, MySQL. I also have a similar test
> environment which I can get up and running fairly quickly.
>
> Should I be running the regression tests either for my own upgr
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Langille
Sent: 17 January 2008 21:55
To: Kern Sibbald
Cc: bacula-devel; bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Beta release of Bacula version 2.2.8
On Jan 17, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I would appreciate any feedback you have on this BETA
On Jan 17, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I would appreciate any feedback you have on this BETA version ...
All regression tests pass on FreeBSD 6.2 and PostgreSQL 8.2.5
Configuration on Thu Jan 17 15:14:09 EST 2008:
Host: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 -- freebsd 6.
Hello,
This afternoon, I release a BETA version of Bacula 2.2.8 to the bacula-beta
and the Win32-beta sections of Source Forge. This release has a number of
bug fixes, most notably a back port of code from the trunk that partially
resolves problems of multiple drive autochangers. This is not
