On Tuesday 2015-09-01 10:06:57 Josh Fisher wrote:
> > Please consider providing statically compiled bacula-fd and other
> > useful tools such as bls, bextract, and possibly few others (with and
> > without openssl support).
> >
> > On Centos 6.x it is impossible to build statically compiled bacula
On 8/31/2015 6:29 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> On Monday 2015-08-31 10:00:32 Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am glad that it is now building for you. Yes, if you have binaries
>> build by Simone, you should wait for him to build new versions -- that
>> will ensure a smooth upgrade.
>>
>> By
On Monday 2015-08-31 10:00:32 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am glad that it is now building for you. Yes, if you have binaries
> build by Simone, you should wait for him to build new versions -- that
> will ensure a smooth upgrade.
>
> By the way, I mentioned to someone on this list that th
ilto:k...@sibbald.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:05 PM
> To: reynie...@gmail.com; John Stoffel
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in
> Centos 6.7
>
> Hello,
>
> Doing:
>
> ./conf
e...@gmail.com; John Stoffel
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in
Centos 6.7
Hello,
Doing:
./configure ... options
make
would be fine and allow you to see if Bacula builds correctly on your
system.
What you do want to
I compiled 7.2.0 on around 50 VMs, I had a problem on one of the 50. I
tried to identify the difference between
that VM and could not so I ended up going to the version before and it
compiled on that VM. I don't remember which
VM it was but if you need the info I will dig through my backup notices
Hello,
Doing:
./configure ... options
make
would be fine and allow you to see if Bacula builds correctly on your
system.
What you do want to avoid in your particular situation is doing:
make install # do not do this
Best regards,
Kern
On 08/27/2015 06:17 AM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I
2015 9:40 AM
To: reynie...@gmail.com
Cc: John Stoffel ; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in
Centos 6.7
reynierpm> Isn't hurt me you're right but what about if I want to update
reynierpm> the release? I will
reynierpm> Isn't hurt me you're right but what about if I want to
reynierpm> update the release? I will need to compile again and that's
reynierpm> exactly what I'm trying to avoid. If you tell me that I can
reynierpm> compile and then update using repository then good I can
reynierpm> compile and
Isn't hurt me you're right but what about if I want to update the release?
I will need to compile again and that's exactly what I'm trying to avoid.
If you tell me that I can compile and then update using repository then
good I can compile and try if not I prefer to wait
On Aug 27, 2015 8:45 AM, "J
It can't hurt to just do a test configure and build.
Reynier> That's exactly what I thought, some bad setup on the CFLAGS, but I'll
waits
Reynier> until Simone builds the RPMS for CentOS, anyway thanks for your
suggestion
Reynier> Regards
Reynier> -Original Message-
Reynier> From: Jo
> "reynierpm@gmail" == reynierpm@gmail com writes:
reynierpm@gmail> Hi there, I'm trying to compile Bacula 7.2.0 because
sadly the release at CentOS is old 5.0.0-13. reynierpm@gmail> So I've
downloaded the latest release from Sourcefore, unzip and detar the
sources and run this reynierpm@gma
@gmail.com
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in
Centos 6.7
>>>>> "reynierpm@gmail" == reynierpm@gmail com <mailto:reynie...@gmail.com>
writes:
reynierpm@gmail> Hi there, I'm trying to
Hi there, I'm trying to compile Bacula 7.2.0 because sadly the release at
CentOS is old 5.0.0-13. So I've downloaded the latest release from
Sourcefore, unzip and detar the sources and run this first command (which I
ran the last time I compiled Bacula from sources around April 2009 when
Bacula was
14 matches
Mail list logo
