The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
I have a Debian system I'd like to use TLS on.
thanks
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
--
Hello everyone,
I am attempting to build Bacula on a Debian system. I am very much new
at Bacula, I have been reading the tutorials past several days, and
right now I am just doing testing on a secondary box before I mess
with the primary. So if I screw something up, tis no big deal. I am
familiar
Anyone creating Debian packages?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out
Dan Langille schrieb:
> The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
> volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
>
> I have a Debian system I'd like to use TLS on.
It seems that a 1.38.5 package will be released soon.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
On 11 Mar 2006 at 15:28, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Dan Langille schrieb:
> > The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
> > volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
> >
> > I have a Debian system I'd like to use TLS on.
>
> It seems that a 1.38.5 package will be releas
Dan Langille wrote:
> The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
> volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
José is working on it, iirc. He has some initial 1.38 packages up
on the web somewhere. Though they didn't have TLS enabled when I
last looked (and he
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:00 -0500, Stack Stack wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am attempting to build Bacula on a Debian system. I am very much new
> at Bacula, I have been reading the tutorials past several days, and
> right now I am just doing testing on a secondary box before I mess
> with the prim
Hello Stack!
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 11:00 am, Stack Stack wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am attempting to build Bacula on a Debian system. I am very much new
> at Bacula, I have been reading the tutorials past several days, and
> right now I am just doing testing on a secondary box before I mess
Thanks for all your input.
That apt-get install was amazingly faster and easier then doing it all
by hand. I knew that apt-get was out there in the world, just wasnt
familiar with it. I will crack open the man pages about it later, as
well as dpkg.
We decided to go with Raid5 as we already have ha
Stack Stack wrote:
> Thanks for all your input.
> That apt-get install was amazingly faster and easier then doing it all
> by hand. I knew that apt-get was out there in the world, just wasnt
> familiar with it. I will crack open the man pages about it later, as
> well as dpkg.
Speaking from person
On Aug 2, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Stack Stack wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am attempting to build Bacula on a Debian system. I am very much new
at Bacula, I have been reading the tutorials past several days, and
right now I am just doing testing on a secondary box before I mess
with the primary. So if I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/2014 01:27 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Anyone creating Debian
packages?
Bacula.org will release them.
We have the binaries packaged already, but
We have two obstacles:
1. Installing
Hmmm I assumed Hauke and Luca were taking good care of Bacula in
Debian, since I can't possibly do it for the time being.
While I
understand your reasons (and /opt/bacula is certainly not the worst
place to install to), I guess having a unified set of packages for both
Bacula Enterprise an
Hello,
Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
These packages will eventually be uploaded to unstable when I feel that
they're solid enough to do so. (Also we must wait a bit due to an
unrelated propogation to te
John Goerzen napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
[...]
Beautiful. Do packages include "fixed"[1] version of restore.c?
[1] -
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Lech Karol Paw??aszek wrote:
> >Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> >experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
> [...]
>
> Beautiful. Do packages include "fixed"[1] version of restore.c?
>
> [1] -
> http://
As always, thanks :-)
On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:59, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
>
> These packages will eventually be uploaded to unstable when I feel that
> the
On 2007-02-26, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As always, thanks :-)
No problem. I have now uploaded the 2.0.2 docs as well.
-- John
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Te
On 2/26/07, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-02-26, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As always, thanks :-)
>
> No problem. I have now uploaded the 2.0.2 docs as well.
>
> -- John
John, any chance to see some day the backport for the 2.0.x ?
(and BTW, thanks A LOT for t
On 11 Mar 2006 at 14:47, hikari wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
> > volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
>
> José is working on it, iirc. He has some initial 1.38 packages up
> on the web somewhere. Though they d
Hello,
Dan Langille a écrit :
> On 11 Mar 2006 at 14:47, hikari wrote:
>
>
>>Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
>>>volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
>>
>> José is working on it, iirc. He has some initial 1.38 packages
Hello,
Dan Langille a écrit :
> On 11 Mar 2006 at 14:47, hikari wrote:
>
>
>>Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The debian packages are quite out of date. Can someone please
>>>volunteer to create a package for 1.38.5 please?
>>
>> José is working on it, iirc. He has some initial 1.38 packages
Il giorno lun, 13/03/2006 alle 10.09 +0100, Baptiste Malguy ha scritto:
> I don't know if it can satify you. I made packages of the 1.38.3. I
> probably didn't make them the exact right way, but they work in my
> product environment (Debian Sarge + some Windows SD). I have only tested
> and current
Il giorno lun, 13/03/2006 alle 11.41 +0100, Davide Corio ha scritto:
> /etc/init.d/bacula-director: line 116: 23936 Segmentation fault
> start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON --
> $ARGS
> failed.
> ***
Davide Corio a écrit :
> Il giorno lun, 13/03/2006 alle 10.09 +0100, Baptiste Malguy ha scritto:
>
>>I don't know if it can satify you. I made packages of the 1.38.3. I
>>probably didn't make them the exact right way, but they work in my
>>product environment (Debian Sarge + some Windows SD). I ha
Baptiste Malguy wrote:
> I'm sorry but I didn't make the source packages, only the binaries. And
> I understand the problem of trust it involves.
You could just toss them the debian/ directory from the source tree.
--
Chris
---
This
hi
i'll provide the new 2.5.42-b2 packages for Debian Lenny/Etch i386/amd64.
README:
- use at your own risk
- openssl is enabled
- no qt/wx gui's included
- maybe one has to apply the DB upgrade himself: the sql-file is found
here /usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/bacula-director-mysql/upgrade/
m
Would you also for Ubuntu? :)
---
Chris Cameron
Sent from: Houston TX United States.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> hi
>
> i'll provide the new 2.5.42-b2 packages for Debian Lenny/Etch i386/amd64.
>
>
> README:
> - use
Hi Chris
> Would you also for Ubuntu? :)
> Chris Cameron
here they are:
README:
- use at your own risk
- openssl is enabled
- no qt/wx gui's included
- maybe one has to apply the DB upgrade himself: the sql-file is found
here /usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/bacula-director-mysql/upgrade/
mysql
I added
deb http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/
deb-src http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/
to my /etc/apt/sources.list and get the following warning:
W: GPG error: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the publi
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:47:34 -0500, Chris Cameron wrote:
> I added
>
> deb http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/ deb-src
> http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/
>
> to my /etc/apt/sources.list and get the following warning:
>
> W: GPG error: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula
Now I get
W: Conflicting distribution: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release
(expected intrepid-bacula but got intrepid-pacemaker)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
~Chris Cameron
Sent from: Houston TX United States.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Thoma
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:21:32 -0500, Chris Cameron wrote:
> Now I get
>
> W: Conflicting distribution: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/
> Release (expected intrepid-bacula but got intrepid-pacemaker) W: You may
> want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
sorry, copy&paste error.
The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade
r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update
Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release.gpg
Ign http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Translation-en_US
Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release
Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrep
Chris Cameron wrote:
> The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade
>
>
> r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update
The repository at:
http://chaschperli.ch/debian/intrepid-bacula
is empty, which is why it's not doing anything. It looks like the
package files didn't make it into the
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:51:08 +0900, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Chris Cameron wrote:
>> The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade
>>
>>
>> r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update
>
> The repository at:
>
> http://chaschperli.ch/debian/intrepid-bacula
>
> is empty, which is why it's n
OK I tried again, and it seemed to work, but bconsole is not reporting the
right version
r...@daffy:/storage/ftproot# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
*bacula-client bacula-common
> r...@daffy:/storage/ftproot# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists...
> Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
> *bacula-client bacula-common bacula-console bacula-director-common
> bacula-director-mysql bacula-fd bacul
The message "packages have been kept back" is an apt-get message; you
can find details about it with a Google search.
Basically, it means that the structure of the packages has been changed
between what is installed and what you are trying to install, and
apt-get is warning you that this is mor
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> as this is a beta version, and the package is not tested
Youch, I spoke too soon on the upgrade.
I just updated the server running the director, or tried to, as I'd
finished updating all the FDs with your packages.
Looks like the pgsql director and sd packages are broken
Craig Ringer wrote:
> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
>> as this is a beta version, and the package is not tested
>
> Youch, I spoke too soon on the upgrade.
>
> I just updated the server running the director, or tried to, as I'd
> finished updating all the FDs with your packages.
>
> Looks like the pg
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:39:18 +0900, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> as this is a beta version, and the package is not tested
>>
>> Youch, I spoke too soon on the upgrade.
>>
>> I just updated the server running the director, or tried to, as I'd
>> finis
end result of "aptitude dist-upgrade": segfault =(
r...@daffy:~# aptitude dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Writing extended state information... Done
The foll
Now when I run it, it seems to have some weird errors
r...@daffy:~# aptitude dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
44 matches
Mail list logo
