> I want to deploy bacula on small network environment I built;
>
> I have 5 clients on windows XP, Two servers on ubuntu 9.10 and one server on
> windows server 2003
>
This is fine. I have a mix of around 50 bacula clients with linux
servers and windows desktops. I have 30TB on tape with my bacula
Hi!
I want to deploy bacula on small network environment I built;
I have 5 clients on windows XP, Two servers on ubuntu 9.10 and one server on
windows server 2003
By the moment I would like to do my backups on hard drives.
Then I would like to set one of the ubuntu machine as the director (the
On 02/ 3/10 04:23 PM, FredNF wrote:
> Le Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:18:37 +0100,
> Henrik Johansen a écrit :
>
>> The bulk of Bacula's DB operations are purely disk IOPS bound so I
>> would argue that IOPS is way more important than RAM.
>>
>>> With the others advices I had, I'm planning to have a dual X
Fred,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:23 AM, FredNF wrote:
> Le Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:18:37 +0100,
> Henrik Johansen a écrit :
>
> > The bulk of Bacula's DB operations are purely disk IOPS bound so I
> > would argue that IOPS is way more important than RAM.
> >
> > > With the others advices I had, I'm p
>
> We backup ~35TB each week in a 3 week rotation so we just have to scale
> out in order to meet our demands and we are planning to go multi-DIR,
> multi-SD with a couple of very hefty MySQL servers to service them.
>
> Holy cow! That's a lot of data.
I'm exploring using ZFS's de-dup function. P
On 02/03/10 10:23, FredNF wrote:
> Right, we never see the problem on this side. The filestem used for the
> director can be:
>
> - if FreeBSD FFS or ZFS (ZFS is nice supported with FreeBSD 8)
> - if Gentoo or Linux Distro, ext4
>
> In the same way, what FS do you, on the list, prefer
Le Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:18:37 +0100,
Henrik Johansen a écrit :
> The bulk of Bacula's DB operations are purely disk IOPS bound so I
> would argue that IOPS is way more important than RAM.
>
> > With the others advices I had, I'm planning to have a dual Xeon
> > Nehalem, with 8 ou 12 GB of RAM, an
Le Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:15:49 -0300,
Heitor Medrado de Faria a écrit :
> I really dont see the point of splitting the pools per "kind of
> server", since you do that by creating different FileSets.
This is linked to our setups.
Take a shared web server, the install is like this:
System (/,
Henrik Johansen wrote:
> On 02/ 3/10 12:06 PM, FredNF wrote:
>
>> Le Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:32:58 -0500,
>> Dan Langille a écrit :
>>
>>
So, my questions are:
- How do I define my pools ?
>>> Define them along the lines of the parameters for Pool. For
>>> starter
On 02/ 3/10 12:06 PM, FredNF wrote:
> Le Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:32:58 -0500,
> Dan Langille a écrit :
>
>>> So, my questions are:
>>> - How do I define my pools ?
>>
>> Define them along the lines of the parameters for Pool. For
>> starters, different retention times require different Pools.
>
FredNF wrote:
> The bacula director, and, the database are planned to be a Dual nehalem
> with SAS drives, according to your thinks and the orthers reponse I had.
>
> But, I'm more dubitative against the pools. You really think that only
> three spools based on weekly, daily and monthly will do the
Le Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:42:35 -0800,
mehma sarja a écrit :
> A couple of more questions to ask yourself are:
> a. How fast do I want to restore the data? If you are forced to
> restore 700 GB - that MIGHT take you 24 hours - depending on your
> hardware. Is that acceptable?
The best option is: as
Hi Heitor.
First, thanks for your advices. And sorry for beeing late, I cannot
approch my station yesterday :)
The bacula director, and, the database are planned to be a Dual nehalem
with SAS drives, according to your thinks and the orthers reponse I had.
But, I'm more dubitative against the poo
Le Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:32:58 -0500,
Dan Langille a écrit :
> > So, my questions are:
> > - How do I define my pools ?
>
> Define them along the lines of the parameters for Pool. For
> starters, different retention times require different Pools.
Then, the pools can be for each kind of serve
Fred wrote:
> Hello dear Bacula (happy) users.
>
> After some testings, I plan to deploy Bacula on my infrastructure. I'm
> currently working for a web hosting enterprise so we have some... weird
> configurations, mixing OS flavours and OS versions.
>
> A little presentation of the infrastructure
Hello dear Bacula (happy) users.
After some testings, I plan to deploy Bacula on my infrastructure. I'm
currently working for a web hosting enterprise so we have some... weird
configurations, mixing OS flavours and OS versions.
A little presentation of the infrastructure:
- Server dedicated
16 matches
Mail list logo
