On 04/14/2012 06:26 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the Director
> and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time."
>
> Is this because of some shared library versions or something else "single
> host environment"- related?
No, it's
Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the
Director
and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time."
Is this because of some shared library versions or something else
"single
host environment"- related?
I'm migrating my old
On 14.04.2012 14:41, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>>> Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the
>>> Director
>>> and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time."
>>>
>>> Is this because of some shared library versions or something else "single
>>> host environment"- related?
>> Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the
>> Director
>> and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time."
>>
>> Is this because of some shared library versions or something else "single
>> host environment"- related?
>>
>> I'm migrating my old CentOS 5.x-32 system
On 14.04.2012 13:26, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the Director
> and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time."
>
> Is this because of some shared library versions or something else "single
> host environment"- related?
>
> I'm migrat
Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the Director
and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time."
Is this because of some shared library versions or something else "single
host environment"- related?
I'm migrating my old CentOS 5.x-32 system with Bacula 5.0.3, to
