Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-03-01 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 25/02/11 16:05, Paulo Martinez wrote: > Am 24.02.2011 um 23:08 schrieb Erik P. Olsen: >> I moved from bacula 3.0.3 to 5.0.3. It was not an upgrade, it was a >> new install. >> However, the database was copied from the old system to the new >> after a version >> upgrade. >> >> Unfortunately I am

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-25 Thread Paulo Martinez
Am 24.02.2011 um 23:08 schrieb Erik P. Olsen: > I moved from bacula 3.0.3 to 5.0.3. It was not an upgrade, it was a > new install. > However, the database was copied from the old system to the new > after a version > upgrade. > > Unfortunately I am unable to check if the indexes have been creat

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-24 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 24/02/11 16:12, Jan Lentfer wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:08:43 +0100, "Erik P. Olsen" > wrote: >> Since I moved to version 5.0.3 I have experienced extemely long restore >> times. >> The time is mostly spend in the building of directory trees. The time > used >> to be >> measured in minutes,

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-24 Thread Jan Lentfer
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:08:43 +0100, "Erik P. Olsen" wrote: > Since I moved to version 5.0.3 I have experienced extemely long restore > times. > The time is mostly spend in the building of directory trees. The time used > to be > measured in minutes, now it is hours. > > My system is Fedora 14,

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-23 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/23/11 17:42, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > Thanks for the tip but unfortunately it didn't change anything when it comes > to > speed. I ran "sudo mysqlcheck -Aaov" and got among apparently normal messages > the following surfaced: > > note : The storage engine for the table doesn't support o

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-23 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 23/02/11 18:01, Daniel Etter wrote: > 2011/2/23 Erik P. Olsen: >> Backup is swift so I don't understand why building of directory trees should >> take so long time. When the directory trees have been build, the restore is >> as >> swift as the backup. >> >> I suspect problems with the mysql dat

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-23 Thread Daniel Etter
2011/2/23 Erik P. Olsen : > Backup is swift so I don't understand why building of directory trees should > take so long time. When the directory trees have been build, the restore is as > swift as the backup. > > I suspect problems with the mysql database but have no idea of what I > could/should d

[Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-23 Thread Erik P. Olsen
Since I moved to version 5.0.3 I have experienced extemely long restore times. The time is mostly spend in the building of directory trees. The time used to be measured in minutes, now it is hours. My system is Fedora 14, bacula 5.0.3, mysql 5.1.55, backup media is a 1 TB external HD with e-sa