Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Kevin Keane wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> Notes: This feature may only makes sense for jobs and files, maybe not for
>> volumes.
>> I haven't fully thought through the implications yet.
>> The interaction between "Keep
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Kevin Keane wrote:
[...]
> Notes: This feature may only makes sense for jobs and files, maybe not for
> volumes.
> I haven't fully thought through the implications yet.
> The interaction between "Keep Copies" and "Volume Retention"
> nee
Mike Ruskai wrote:
> On 04/07/2009 04:21, Kevin Keane wrote:
>
>> Item n: implement retention times specified as number of copies.
>> Date: 4/6/2009
>> Origin: Kevin Keane - subscription at kkeane dot com
>> Status:
>>
>>
>>
> I very much like this idea. I have pretty much en
Dan Langille wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kevin Keane wrote:
>
>> Item n: implement retention times specified as number of copies.
>> Date: 4/6/2009
>> Origin: Kevin Keane - subscription at kkeane dot com
>> Status:
>>
>> What: Currently, the retentio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Keane wrote:
> Item n: implement retention times specified as number of copies.
> Date: 4/6/2009
> Origin: Kevin Keane - subscription at kkeane dot com
> Status:
>
> What: Currently, the retention time for a volume/job etc. is a
>
On 04/07/2009 04:21, Kevin Keane wrote:
> Item n: implement retention times specified as number of copies.
> Date: 4/6/2009
> Origin: Kevin Keane - subscription at kkeane dot com
> Status:
>
>
I very much like this idea. I have pretty much enough storage for two
full backups plus in
Item n: implement retention times specified as number of copies.
Date: 4/6/2009
Origin: Kevin Keane - subscription at kkeane dot com
Status:
What: Currently, the retention time for a volume/job etc. is a
fixed number of seconds from the last time the item (volume,
job
